On January 17, 2002, a Thomson 757 aircraft experienced a bird strike while on approach to Manchester Airport in the United Kingdom. The incident, which occurred just before the plane was due to land, resulted in the death of one passenger and the injury of several others.
The Thomson 757, a narrow-bodied jetliner commonly used for medium-haul flights, was carrying 189 passengers and a crew of six at the time of the incident. As the plane descended towards the airport, it encountered a flock of birds, believed to be starlings, which were drawn to the airport by the presence of food. One of the birds collided with the plane's left engine, causing a loud explosion and a sudden loss of power.
The pilot, Captain David McClelland, was able to maintain control of the aircraft and performed an emergency landing at Manchester Airport. Despite the successful landing, the impact of the bird strike had caused significant damage to the left engine, which was later found to be completely destroyed.
The incident resulted in the death of one passenger, who was sitting in a seat near the left engine and was killed by debris from the explosion. Several other passengers were injured, including one who suffered a broken leg. The rest of the passengers and crew were unharmed.
Bird strikes are a common occurrence in aviation, with planes colliding with birds on a regular basis. In most cases, these collisions result in minimal damage to the aircraft and no injuries to passengers or crew. However, as the Thomson 757 incident demonstrates, bird strikes can sometimes have serious consequences.
To prevent bird strikes, airports and airlines implement a number of measures to deter birds from coming into close proximity with planes. These measures include the use of bird control devices, such as pyrotechnics and loud noise makers, and the removal of food sources that attract birds to the airport. In addition, planes are equipped with strong, resistant windshields and engines that are designed to withstand bird strikes.
Despite these precautions, bird strikes will continue to be a risk in aviation. However, the probability of a serious incident occurring can be minimized through the implementation of effective bird control measures and the continued use of safety technology.
Thomson 757 Bird strike video
Dead foot, dead engine. A degree of damage almost goes hand in hand with bird strikes, regardless of where on the airframe the impact occurs and these incidents are not regular 'everyday' occurrences. Videos, gifs, articles, or aftermath photos of machinery, structures, or devices that have failed catastrophically during operation, destructive testing, and other disasters. The crashes are quite similar in cause, in that they both ran out of energy a bit before the threshold. The airflow which includes the fuel mixture is disrupted by our avian friend here, the engine is coughing like you would when chocking on a small bit of food for example and that results in that fiery pulse. But also at takeoff losing two on the same side you may not have enough rudder authority to overcome the yaw of full thrust.
A direct question in the title will suffice, otherwise you must add a comment! By: PMN - 8th May 2007 at 15:51 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00 Yes, they did do a very good job, but they are trained to cope with this situations, bird strikes happen everyday On a worldwide scale, yes, but I think I can say with a reasonable degree of certainty bird strikes do not feature in a pilot's typical day. Too many times have planes crashesd because someone got distracted by a possible issue at low altitude. The pilot declared an emergency and dumped excess fuel before landing at 1030. Source: High Quality Video: I am rather impressed at the way the flight crew handled this emergency, particularly the landing. I could also be wrong about the loss count, but I'm sure I remember properly.
ThomsonFly 757 bird strike & flames captured on video : flying
Can a 747 or a380 stay out of the water with two engines? The aircraft, with 221 passengers on board, was heading for Arrecife, Lanzarote, when the birds hit the right hand engine, causing a flameout and repeated puffs of black smoke. Edit: clarify cause of surging is due to pressure relief valve, not relight system. That's not a knock on British ATC or anything though! It was believed that during this time the boundary between the worlds of the living and the dead became thin and blurred, and spirits had the ability to return to earth. The damage is only worse in Asiana because of the seawall impact which caused the tail damage and fuselage movement you see in the video. There is a pressure relief valve that eventually engages, and the engine releases all those hot gases right away, which catch fire in this case and produce the spectacular effect. Think it landed in Jakarta. So you would push on the right rudder pedal to counteract this force.
ThomsonFly 757 bird strike & flames captured on video
There's innumerable examples of this happening on Google. Overall they were quite similar though. It may seem obvious from the ground which one is failed, but serious accidents have occurred when pilots mistakenly shut down their only remaining good engine. This exact situation is covered in their training, I 100% guarantee it. The Asiana crash was a bit harder however and damaged the fuselage at the rear, causing some passengers and flight attendants to fall out - and then there was later a fire.
Have you looked into bird strikes? It's why airports use trained birds of prey to clear other birds away as much as possible. In a twin engined plane the rudder and yaw of a single engine is taken into account. The engine, a Rolls-Royce RB211-535E4, was shut down and the pilot made a successful emergency landing on one engine. It's interesting to see what happens when a goose turns into a 60 ton object that's hell bent on hurting your plane. Eventually this stops when fuel is cut off off as part of shutting down the engine. Further, self-promotion of social media accounts or blogs is not allowed outside of an officially designated self-promotion post.
So if you lose your left engine, the right engine is going to provide yaw trying to turn the plane to the left as you have drag on the left, thrust on the right. The British Airways one was much more controlled and the aircrafts main fuselage and structure except the gear and engines really remained intact so I can understand why the ATC reacted a little more intensely in SFO. . Hence the saying, dead foot, dead engine. Catastrophic Failure refers to the sudden and complete destruction of an object or structure, from massive bridges and cranes, all the way down to small objects being destructively tested or breaking. If posting only a photo, video, or link, you must include a relevant top-level comment to start conversation.
You read into my words and in the process completely missed the point, Sam! And the dead engine is on your left. So the actions and checklists are very deliberate to ensure both pilots double check they are shutting down the faulty one. Simon Lowe was on hand when a Thomson 757 engine sucked in a bird on take-off a few weeks ago, and he caught the whole thing on video. We may no longer dress up on All Hallows Eve with the intention of warding off evil or maybe some people do? By: PMN - 8th May 2007 at 17:20 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00 A Bird Strike is just like saying Boeing Or Airbus; It covers alot of different area, of which you can go into further. A spotter captured the moment when two herons were sucked into a Thomson Fly Boeing 757-200 moments after lift-off from Manchester airport at 9.
Video of the Week: B757 Bird Strike at Manchester Ringway International Airport (Simon Lowe)
So when you lose an engine your first reaction should be to counteract the imbalance yaw by using the rudder. Nevertheless, that's a one in a million chance unless the aircraft is empty. But as noted they need to focus on flying the plane first - and importantly, focus on identifying the correct engine to shut down. Gets murkier when you have advanced auto pilots. Like, does the airline give them the rest of the day off, or do they hop in another plane and finish their shift? They're what caused US Airways flight 1549 to go down and Sully Sullenberger to land in the Hudson. Thankfully were able to relight but at the time appeared they may end up in the sea. Costumes would be worn to ward off any malevolent spirits.
