The man he killed. The Man He Killed Analysis 2022-11-07

The man he killed Rating: 9,7/10 1820 reviews

The Man He Killed is a poem written by Thomas Hardy in 1902. The poem is a reflection on the nature of war and the human cost it entails. In the poem, the speaker reflects on the fact that he has killed a man in battle, but he also recognizes that the man he killed was just like him, with his own hopes, dreams, and reasons for being on the battlefield.

The poem begins with the speaker stating that he "met him face to face," implying that the man he killed was not just an anonymous enemy, but someone he actually saw and interacted with. The speaker then goes on to describe the man he killed as "young," "fair," and "fierce," indicating that he was a formidable opponent in battle.

However, despite the fact that the man was his enemy, the speaker also recognizes that he had his own life and experiences. He notes that the man he killed "thought he'd 'list, perhaps, / Off-hand like—just as I— / Was out of work—had sold his traps— / No other reason why." This suggests that the man was not necessarily fighting for any grand cause, but rather that he was simply trying to make a living and support himself.

The speaker then goes on to contemplate the idea that the man he killed may have had a family and friends who would miss him, just as the speaker himself has loved ones who would grieve for him if he were to die in battle. He asks, "Had he and I but met / By some old ancient inn, / We should have set us down to wet / Right many a nipperkin!" This line suggests that, in a different context, the two men might have been friends and enjoyed each other's company over a drink.

Ultimately, The Man He Killed is a poignant reflection on the tragedy of war and the inherent humanity of even one's enemies. It highlights the fact that, in the midst of conflict, it is easy to dehumanize and vilify one's opponents, but that each person is a unique individual with their own hopes, dreams, and reasons for being on the battlefield. The poem serves as a reminder to consider the human cost of war and the fact that, even in the midst of conflict, we are all more alike than we might think.

The Man He Killed by Thomas Hardy

the man he killed

Cite this page as follows: "The Man He Killed - Summary" eNotes Publishing Ed. Living in London, during the period of his early career, he was quit predisposed by the works of Robert Browning, Charles Swinburne, and Charles Darwin. But ranged as infantry, And staring face to face, I shot at him as he at me, And killed him in his place. The speaker feels remorse but feels justified because it was a "kill or be killed" situation. The speaker, in the first stanza, wonders what would be the condition if they met in different, normal circumstances. This poem shows the effect that setting has on the relationship between characters in a text. Most of the words are of one syllable, and there are no similes or metaphors.

Next

The Man He Killed by Thomas Hardy

the man he killed

The speaker does not appear completely convinced by this reasoning, however. This poem is written by Thomas Hardy. He might have merely sold off his belongings and joined the war almost on a whim, with no other reasoning or motive such as that of anger or resentment. Thus, the speaker displays empathy towards the enemy since he understands the predicament they both were in. They are in a battle to serve their flag and the interests of their nations.

Next

The Man He Killed Analysis

the man he killed

Answer: The poet calls war quaint and curious because it changes you as a person. He says that he killed a man because he was his foe; however, he is not able to explain why the soldier is his enemy. Although this poem seems to be jumping around in circles it is an anti-war poem and depicts war as pointless. The historical context of this poem is actually the Boer war. They had faced each other on the battlefield and were firing at each other. The title of the poem goes "The Man He Killed".

Next

The Man He Killed

the man he killed

Both men were just doing their duty, the speaker implies. Stanza 4: In this stanza, the narrator mentions the reason what would make his victim fight on the frontline. A psychoanalytic approach would say that there is a point in the speaker's life which he actually does not comprehend. The content of this poem may not seem to relate to the lives of middle schoolers but because it is a short poem that is filled with action it is easy for students to stay engaged in the text. Other Reading Thomas Hardy; Wilfred Owen: Simon Armitage:. Had he and I but met By some old ancient inn, We should have sat us down to wet Right many a nipperkin! Stanza 5: "Yes; quaint and curious war is! The event has changed him. Killing, injuring, fighting must not have been in the minds of both these people.

Next

Thomas Hardy

the man he killed

In this stanza, he expresses that a change of scenario would properly foster a friendship between the two men. Had the other man been in trouble, he would happily have helped him out in any way he could. This is shown in how fluent he speaks when he is not speaking about the event. They will focus on the way that their sentences flow and how they use the structure of their work to create their desired effect, putting more emphasis on certain aspects and less on others. It portrays realistic struggles an unnamed protagonist has to go through as he tries to justify him killing another man but ultimately fails. He might be mimicking a studer.

Next

The Man He Killed: Analysis, Tone & Summary

the man he killed

Hardy was opposed to the war and believed the Boers were justified in defending their homes. You can help us out by revising, improving and updating thissection. Have you read these? Answer: There were two people with two guns who met each other face to face. . They never enlisted to kill a fellow man but to earn an honest living serving their nation. Had he and I but met By some old ancient inn, We should have set us down to wet Right many a nipperkin! A page that he cannot just tear away from his life.

Next

The Man He Killed Summary

the man he killed

The poem speaks about the nature of war and the destruction it causes. The speaker, being poor is enlisted as an infantryman for the frontline, who is supposed to take orders from the superior authority. The poem itself was actually wrote to be read as a play as a soldier returning from war to give his events during war hence why the poem is in past tense. The Then, he contemplates the mocking nature of war, saying that he did not join the war to kill someone. Supposedly, the time of the event precedes the time of narrating.

Next

The Man He Killed Quotes

the man he killed

The work of a soldier seemed just like any other profession or occupation. The second date is today's date — the date you are citing the material. This poem is from the perspective of a man that had to kill someone during war but exploring the possible relationship they could have had had the circumstances been different. Second, the person who still stutters when he is telling about the event. The speech becomes again more rhythmic and regular in this stanza. He views the enemy as innocent just as he is in the grand scheme of things.

Next

"The Man He Killed" by Thomas Hardy

the man he killed

QUESTION: What statment about war is the poet making? Retrieved 23 May 2015. The poet is implying that innocent people needlessly die because of war and that the ones that suffer are normal, ordinary people, like you or I. The poem details what the soldiers feel while killing another soldier from the opposite side. The poem also has some repetition in it that students will be able to notice. We are thankful for their contributions and encourage you to make yourown.

Next