The dilemma of obedience refers to the ethical conflict that arises when an individual is faced with the choice of either following orders or authority figures or standing up for their own beliefs and values. This dilemma is particularly relevant in situations where the orders or requests of authority figures may be unethical or immoral, such as in cases of military obedience, corporate loyalty, or obedience to abusive relationships.
One of the most well-known examples of the dilemma of obedience is the Milgram experiment, conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram in the 1960s. In this experiment, participants were instructed to administer increasingly intense electric shocks to a learner (who was actually an actor) every time they answered a question incorrectly. Despite the learner's cries of pain and protest, the majority of participants continued to follow the experimenter's orders and administer the shocks. This experiment demonstrated the power of authority and the willingness of individuals to obey even when doing so goes against their own moral convictions.
There are several factors that contribute to the dilemma of obedience. One of these is the desire to fit in and be accepted by a group or authority figure. In some cases, individuals may feel pressure to conform to the expectations of those around them and may be afraid of being ostracized or punished if they do not follow orders. Another factor is the belief that the authority figure or group has more knowledge or expertise than the individual, leading them to believe that the orders are justified.
The dilemma of obedience also raises important questions about the nature of morality and personal responsibility. On one hand, there is the argument that individuals should be held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether they were following orders or not. On the other hand, there is the idea that individuals should not be held fully responsible if they were simply following orders and were not aware of the consequences of their actions.
Overall, the dilemma of obedience highlights the complex ethical considerations that arise when an individual is faced with the choice of following orders or standing up for their own beliefs. It is important for individuals to consider their own values and moral convictions when faced with this dilemma, as well as the potential consequences of their actions. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide how they will respond to the dilemma of obedience and to take responsibility for their decisions.
The Dilemma of Obedience
Now it is with all this background and history that we now get to the Dilemma. So skip over to Daniel, Ezra, Esther, Jeremiah and Nehemiah and we see Jews in foreign lands serving kings. His ministry of teaching and preaching took him for a time to the United States and Japan. If you want to here more of those stories and ways to help please see us at the table we have in the entry. He has taken a small part of a generation and destroyed it all. He is the one that through many years of friendships and battles won and lost that he has gotten to where he is today. So as we have gleaned from so much of the incredible entry of God in the flesh, Emanuel or Saviour and as we go on into the new year let us remember that the same dilemma Herod had and the wisemen had is ours today, who do we listen to.
Faithlife
So I paused and said, listen I know i am not your dad. ® ODB: Algae and Diatoms 3 Ways To Live A Joy-Filled Life. But because of the appointment of Daniel they became biblical scholars that believed everything is biblical, the sun, the moon, the stars, the grass, the dirt, everything. Our largest program that we do is our after school program. So we began to dive in to his grades, work, family and relationships and he is really coming along and working through that. What is your decision? Herod has been coined and known as the King of the Jews. It is your own enemy—the very man; he is about to be burnt.
The Dilemma of Obedience on JSTOR
Scripture quotations taken from The Holy Bible, New International Version® NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc. You also have the dilemma of the wisemen. Not only that but these Persians come in to his city to his territory and are proclaiming him King. In 2 Chronicles we see Nebuchadnezzar King of the Babylonian empire, which later became captured by the Persian Empire, take captive Judea and the Jews because of their disobedience to God. Now this is crazy.
A king of the Jews. What makes sense to us? We also have envelopes for our campaign. God did not tell Samuel to tell Eli; he had to decide that for himself. They had weaknesses and made mistakes. Herod found truth in his power and might, not knowing that it is God who gives that and takes it away. Anitpator had the power to anoint rulers over the lands that he had control over and gave each of his sones to regions. Frequent topics include school improvement, leadership, standards, accountability, the achievement gap, classroom practice, professional development, teacher education, research, technology and innovations in teaching and learning, state and federal policy, and education and the global economy.
