Shooting an elephant short story summary. Shooting an Elephant Summary & Analysis 2022-11-02

Shooting an elephant short story summary Rating: 6,1/10 1153 reviews

"Shooting an Elephant" is a short story written by George Orwell, first published in 1936. The story is a narrative of Orwell's experience as a British police officer in Burma, where he was stationed during the colonial period.

The story begins with Orwell reflecting on his role as a police officer and the conflict he feels between his personal feelings and the expectations placed on him by his role. He describes the oppressive and authoritarian nature of the British colonial government, and the tension that exists between the colonizers and the native Burmese population.

One day, Orwell receives a report that a rogue elephant is causing damage in a village. As the local police officer, it is his responsibility to deal with the situation. Despite his lack of experience and his reluctance to kill the elephant, Orwell feels pressure to take action, both from the villagers and from his own sense of duty.

Orwell sets out to track down the elephant and eventually finds it in a paddy field. He attempts to scare the elephant away with loud noises, but the elephant does not respond. Orwell then decides to shoot the elephant, but he is conflicted and unsure if it is the right thing to do. He ultimately decides to shoot the elephant, believing it is his duty as a police officer. However, he feels guilty and conflicted about his decision, as he has come to see the elephant as a victim of the oppressive colonial system.

The story ends with Orwell reflecting on the moral ambiguities of his role as a colonial police officer and the ways in which he was caught between his personal feelings and the expectations placed on him by his role. He ultimately concludes that the shooting of the elephant was a futile and meaningless act, driven more by the expectations of others than by his own sense of right and wrong.

"Shooting an Elephant" is a powerful and thought-provoking story that explores themes of colonialism, power, and morality. It serves as a commentary on the complex and often conflicting roles that individuals play within oppressive systems, and the ways in which these roles can shape and influence our actions and decisions.

Shooting an Elephant Summary & Analysis

shooting an elephant short story summary

Upon laying eyes on the elephant he instantly feels that it might be wrong to kill it. The crowd roars in excitement, and the elephant appears suddenly weakened. When he encounters with the elephant, he knows that the elephant has destroyed the market. He feels their eyes on him, and their great they need to ascertain the spectacle. After that, he began to feel uncomfortable and pressured by the crowd to shoot the elephant once he found him. All these created a sense of guilt in Orwell's mind and he thought that imperialism is obviously evil as it never worked for the development of the country but always wanted to suppress the common people.

Next

“Shooting an Elephant” Summary & Analysis

shooting an elephant short story summary

Orwell is no different from other British oppressors. In addition, he believed that killing the wild animal was an inhumane act. Orwell repeatedly fired at the elephant, but it failed to die instantly. What does it mean to be laughed at? When the narrator finally comes upon the elephant. An elephant has broken loose and is wreaking havoc on the villagers. Due to the conflict of interest, Orwell was justified for the decision he made since it was for the benefit of many people.

Next

Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell Plot Summary

shooting an elephant short story summary

Unthinkable … And from this point, Orwell extrapolates his own experience to consider the colonial experience at large: the white European may think he is in charge of his colonial subjects, but ironically — even paradoxically — the coloniser loses his own freedom when he takes it upon himself to subjugate and rule another people: I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. Orwell notes that he is lucky the elephant killed a man, because it gave his own actions legal justification. Without describing his shame or guilt, he leaves the elephant alive, suffering terribly. Finally, the narrator leaves. Upon laying eyes on the elephant he instantly feels that it would be wrong to kill it.

Next

Summary of Shooting an Elephant short essay

shooting an elephant short story summary

Feeling compelled to do some decent policing, Orwell sets out with a small rifle to see what's happening. He entertains the possibility of doing nothing and letting the elephant live, but concludes that this would make the crowd laugh at him. A third shot downs the elephant. Despite the fact, that he had released a deadly bullet, he orders another sophisticated firearm to finish the animal quickly. He pretends to be caring for the light of the people, but his actions are quite different from what he claims to be standing for in society. It would go against everything in him to kill it.

Next

Shooting an Elephant Study Guide

shooting an elephant short story summary

Orwell decides that the best way to handle the situation would be to approach the elephant to test its temperament and only harm the animal if it behaved aggressively. So, unwillingly, he was guided here and there by the will of the yellow faces Burmese. In the incident, that he kills the elephant, he was forced to act against his will. Still, Orwell does not want to kill the beast. They should provide alternative solutions to people that have fewer severe implications Lumsden et al, 2012, pp. Despite being under intense pressure from the public, the police officer had the freedom to make his decision. Check the links below for a detailed summary of the story and for additional information to help you better understand it.

Next

Shooting an Elephant: Summary & Analysis

shooting an elephant short story summary

He shoots the elephant several times. To come all that way, rifle in hand, with two thousand people marching at my heels, and then to trail feebly away, having done nothing — no, that was impossible. Infact, he wants to control it. The narrator says: When the white man turns tyrant, it is his own freedom that he destroys The narrator shoots and shoots and shoots again. It has destroyed a hut, killed a cow, and raided some fruit stalls for food. His morality staunchly opposes the abuses that result from empire and his own role in that empire, but he is unable to overcome his visceral urge to avenge the indignities he suffers at the hands of the Burmese.

Next

Shooting an Elephant

shooting an elephant short story summary

My parents told me that it was not the age of love making but the time of studying hard. At that time, I got confusion whether to be with him or leave. Orwell fires more, but the bullets have no effect. The protagonist was in an influential person meaning that if he chose the alternative decision of refusing to kill the animal, nobody was going to proceed to take action against him for absconding his duty. It was perfectly clear to me what I ought to do.

Next

Shooting An Elephant Summary story

shooting an elephant short story summary

Their attitude influences the leading actors that colonialism leads to contradictory thinking as Orwell is able to better understand imperialism through his run - in with the elephant because the elephant serves as a symbol of colonialism. They expects that he will kill the elephant. Regarding the death of elephant, Europeans had duel opinions. Edward Said, a Palestinian-American who grew up under British rule, helped establish the field of post-colonial studies with his seminal work 1978, Orientalism. Because it is both a harmless animal and a valuable piece of property, it is clear that there is no ethical or practical reason to hurt the elephant.


Next