The debate over whether minors should be tried as adults has been a longstanding and controversial issue. On one hand, supporters of trying minors as adults argue that it is necessary in order to hold young people accountable for their actions and to protect society from dangerous individuals. On the other hand, opponents argue that minors are not fully developed cognitively and emotionally, and therefore should not be subjected to the same punishments as adults.
One argument in favor of trying minors as adults is that it serves as a deterrent to crime. If young people know that they will be held to the same standards as adults, they may be less likely to engage in criminal activity. Additionally, trying minors as adults may also help to ensure that dangerous individuals are not released back into society, where they could potentially harm others.
However, opponents argue that minors are not fully developed cognitively and emotionally, and therefore should not be held to the same standards as adults. They argue that young people do not have the same level of impulse control or decision-making skills as adults, and are more susceptible to peer pressure and outside influences. This can lead to poor judgement and decision-making, and as a result, minors may be more likely to engage in criminal activity.
Additionally, opponents argue that trying minors as adults can have negative long-term consequences. Studies have shown that minors who are tried and sentenced as adults are more likely to reoffend in the future, compared to those who are tried in the juvenile justice system. This may be due to the fact that minors who are tried as adults are more likely to be placed in adult facilities, where they are exposed to more hardened and experienced criminals. This exposure can further facilitate their criminal behavior and make it more difficult for them to reintegrate into society upon release.
Overall, the debate over whether minors should be tried as adults is complex and multifaceted. While there are arguments to be made on both sides, it is ultimately up to society to determine what approach is best in terms of ensuring public safety and promoting rehabilitation and reintegration.
📌 Should Minors Who Commit Violent Crimes be Tried as Adults? Free Essay, Research Paper Example
Will trying juveniles in the same way as adults turn out to be a better solution and act as a deterrent to stop crime? During adolescence they are still trying to deal with society and their own inner battles of peer pressure, lack of direction, impulsiveness and the like. If these teens where given a standard youth sentence, then there is an excellent chance that they would be back on the street by the age of 25. The same should apply, if a juvenile is to commit a heinous crime like homicide or first-degree murder, they should be tried and sentenced for the crime. I feel that juveniles should not be tried as an adult due to the harsh consequences that could be done to the person. Never under estimate the knowledge of kids and youths due to their first impression, the way they look, dress and act. Most muder victims under the 18 are killed by adults. The idea was to educate and rehabilitate juveniles so as to attack what were believed to be the roots of juvenile delinquency—a lack of moral education and standards.
Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults, Persuasive Essay Sample
There is always a punishment when they are broken. Both sides should use this article, as it provides detailed arguments for each position. Sponsored content Children committing crimes in Georgia are typically tried under the juvenile system. Many of these points, we are aware, are in direct opposition of each other, and yet, each of these issues is worth considering and argued upon. Both the Juvenile Justice GPS and report from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention explain that in a judicial waiver, the juvenile court judge has the responsibility of waiving jurisdiction, thereby sending the case to adult court. Also, the main sections of this paper will include the following topics: The reasons for and against adult trails for minors who have committed violent crimes. Juvenile courts do not offer records that provide an explicit proof of lenience that is based on age, but the sentences offered to kids that are comparable to adult crimes suggest that this is a conclusion one could draw from the data.
_0.jpg?itok=p_7de0oY)
