Marxism in wuthering heights. Analysis of Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights 2022-11-03
Marxism in wuthering heights Rating:
7,8/10
153
reviews
Marxism is a political and economic ideology that was developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the mid-19th century. It is based on the idea that society is divided into classes based on their relationship to the means of production, with the bourgeoisie (the owners of the means of production) exploiting the proletariat (the working class) in order to maintain their own power and wealth.
In Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë portrays a society that is deeply divided along class lines, with the wealthy landowners living in comfort and luxury while the poor workers toil on the land. The novel follows the lives of several characters who are caught up in the struggles of this class-based society, including Heathcliff, a poor orphan who is taken in by the wealthy Earnshaw family and becomes embroiled in a bitter feud with the wealthy Linton family.
Through the character of Heathcliff, Brontë shows the ways in which the capitalist system can create and perpetuate inequality and suffering. Heathcliff is treated as an inferior and outsider by the wealthy families, who see him as a means to an end rather than as a person with his own desires and needs. Despite his intelligence and ambition, Heathcliff is unable to break free from the chains of his class status and is doomed to a life of poverty and exploitation.
Marxism is also evident in the novel in the way that the characters' relationships with property and land are depicted. The ownership of land is closely tied to social status and power, and the characters who own land are able to exert control over those who do not. For example, the wealthy Mr. Lockwood is able to take over the Wuthering Heights estate, even though it was originally owned by the poor Heathcliff, because he has the money and social status to do so.
Overall, Wuthering Heights is a powerful portrayal of the ways in which class-based societies can create and perpetuate inequality and suffering. Through the character of Heathcliff and the depiction of the relationships between the wealthy and the poor, Brontë shows the devastating effects of capitalism and the need for a more just and equal society.
Marxism Criticism Essay (Wuthering Heights)
Wuthering Heights represents these three factors to perfection. The story emphasizes the Marxist argument that in a capitalist society, the rich get richer and the poor stay poor. Works Cited Bronte, Emily. The guest was now the master of the Wuthering Heights: he held firm possession, and proved it to the attorney, who, in his turn, proved it to Mr. He uses the Lintons to accomplish this. Cathy cannot exist without him, but a meaningful relationship is not possible because Cathy sees Heathcliff only as a reflection of herself.
Marxism Criticism Essay (Wuthering Heights), Sample of Essays
Cultural issues of human resource management Key Words: Cross-cultural, cultural baggage, cultural dimensions, coaching, mentoring, socio-cultural anthropology Introduction The aim of this paper is to report on the results of a study designed to explore the emerging discipline of cross-cultural coaching and to establish the levels. What he meant to do with it, and whether he were mad? As we can see, he is the only character that embodies any revolutionary traits. He is coaxed into the idea that he is in fact the rightful king and this begins the process of self-damnation for Macbeth. The second asserts that Heathcliff is simply a victim of circumstance. He is destitute and no longer respected in the community.
Reading Wuthering Heights Through Marxist Ideas: [Essay Example], 1957 words GradesFixer
That two such opposing modes of behavior could arise in the same environment prevents the reader from easy condemnation of either pair. When Heathcliff is first introduced to the family, Nelly Dean says, I was frightened, and Mrs. There are several significant differences between Heathcliff and the rest of the family. Within the limited setting that the novel itself describes, society is divided between two opposing worlds: Wuthering Heights, ancestral home of the Earnshaws, and Thrushcross Grange, the Linton estate. Heathcliff and Cathy, two prominent characters in the novel, interact in the second half of the novel. He is unable to avenge his mistreatment without changing into his abuser, since shown in the way he snacks Hareton and the other users of the next generation. The big society: a realistic objective or a political myth? Heathcliff, too, has denied an important aspect of his personality.
According to Marxist theory, within a capitalist economic system, somebody has to lose for somebody else to win. However, he is only later discriminated against for the same exact reason. What he meant to do with it, and whether he were mad? Cathy stayed at Thrushcross Grange five weeks, till Christmas. Nelly, you are not glad! He sees her as an asset to use at his disposal because of her youth and naivety when they marry. . There are several significant differences between Heathcliff and the rest of the family.
The Marxist Mirror Of Emily Bronte 's ' Wuthering Heights '
However, some characters in the novel experience a huge social downfall, like Hindley. . Heathcliff displays economic determinism by adapting to the ocial culture of his enemies for his own benefit. Lockwood, an urban sophisticate on retreat, misunderstands his own character as well as the characters of others. This individual endeavors to set the seemingly remote setting of this story in a social context, concentrating on the social and economic structures by play. Although Hindley still technically holds his social station during his life, he becomes completely powerless and lives in constant fear of Heathcliff and his rising social status.
Wuthering Heights and the Marxist Critique: [Essay Example], 1188 words GradesFixer
Bronte, primarily utilized Heathcliff as an easy way to make remarks on the role of women in this society. The same economical and family dynamics which exist in this textual content can be found in the present. The initial suggests that Heathcliff has poor blood, and the introduction of the foreign avenue urchin to Wuthering Altitudes is the single catalyst pertaining to the challenges that befall its occupants. Bronte used her novel as a presentation of the lack of rights women had at the time, as well as a social assessment on the belittlement of the rich towards the poor. He gives a more victimizing and sympathetic view of Heathcliff, and justifies it with the assumption that social climbing is a necessary survival tactic for even the most estranged individual. Viewing Wuthering Heights in a Marxist criticism lens, it seems that the novel truly is a erfect example of the kind of society that Karl Marx completely warned against.
Mores on the Moors: Social Class and Power in Wuthering Heights
The dialect in Wuthering Heights is used by contrasting the two different realms: the farm owners that farmed their own land, and the rich society that overtakes the minds of a large quantity of characters. Eagleton almost absolves the child Heathcliff of any intentional destruction, but he does assert that the introduction of the boy to the Heights disrupts an already tenuous social order. . Catherine offered Heathcliff human companionship, something he was certainly not used to given his discreetly rough background as a waif and his mistreatment at Wuthering Heights. The Brontës A to Z: The Essential Reference to Their Lives and Work. Is usually Heathcliff a victim or is he a villain? The base is the material conditions of society, and the superstructure is the social world dominated by our culture and ideology.
He endeavors to put the seemingly remote setting of this novel in a societal context, focusing on the social and economic structures at play. The dialect in Wuthering Heights is used by contrasting the two different realms: the farm owners that farmed their own land, and the rich society that overtakes the minds of a large quantity of characters. He is the victim of a capitalist society that transforms people who seek progression into villains. This premise gives this older and often overread text new contemporary relevance, perhaps explaining why people are still fascinated by this work today. Earnshaw who brought Heathcliff home with him.
He abuses his only son and fears Heathcliff immeasurably. Heathcliff is compelled to participate because of his desire to impress Mr. This means that while the capitalist is making money from the product that the laborer produces, by selling it, the wage laborer is making less than the value of his product and often only enough money to survive. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. Her high born status means that she does not have to work for her social class like Heathcliff.
Marxist criticism and wuthering heights by emily bronte Essay Example
Heathcliff acts as a capitalist in that he treats the people around him as laborers that he can use to generate even more capital for himself. Although Heathcliff was taken care of by the Earnshaws, it was evident that he was completely an outsider. It is not necessary, however, to examine in depth the Victorian context of Wuthering Heights to sense the dialectic contrast of environments. Her greed and desire to be more powerful expedites the tragedy in her life after her decision to marry Edgar because after their marriage she maintains her social power, but she marries someone she does not truly love. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
