Lost in the funhouse. Lost in the Funhouse by John Barth 2022-10-15
Lost in the funhouse Rating:
4,1/10
1097
reviews
Lost in the Funhouse is a short story collection written by John Barth and published in 1968. The title story, "Lost in the Funhouse," is a metafiction that explores the concept of identity and the role of the author in constructing it.
The story follows a young boy named Ambrose as he wanders through a funhouse at the beach. As he moves from one room to the next, Ambrose becomes disoriented and begins to lose track of time and his own sense of self. The funhouse mirrors and distortions only serve to confuse him further, and he becomes "lost" in the labyrinth of his own mind.
One of the central themes of the story is the idea that identity is not fixed, but rather a constantly shifting construct. Ambrose's journey through the funhouse mirrors the process of self-discovery that we all go through as we grow and change. The funhouse, with its confusing and disorienting mirrors, represents the many different facets of our identity and the ways in which we try to make sense of them.
Another theme of the story is the role of the author in constructing identity. As Ambrose wanders through the funhouse, he begins to question who he is and what his place in the world is. In doing so, he becomes aware of the presence of the author, who is described as a "funhouse master" who controls the various rooms and attractions. The author, in this case, represents the outside forces that shape and influence our identity.
Overall, "Lost in the Funhouse" is a thought-provoking and evocative story that explores the complex and ever-changing nature of identity. It invites us to consider the ways in which we construct and understand ourselves, and the role that others play in shaping who we are.
Lost in the Funhouse Summary & Study Guide
Romantic Postmodernism in American Fiction. I finally found this copy and a copy of Giles Goat-Boy in my favourite second-hand bookshop the other week. I think he missed the empty swimming pool this time. Then they arrive in Maryland. The love of his life and his older brother ran off together to another part of the funhouse. Sure, If on a Winter's Night a Traveler is perhaps more lighthearted and accessible--but, hell, if you're not educated enough to know the Iliad and the Odyssey then you probably don't want to read any Pomo novels anyway. No mistake here, I checked the galley-proofs: this is what the author intended.
There are details of the story told to Eidothea which he cannot tell to Proteus, just as he does not care to tell Helen all that he told Eidothea, and here he is telling it all to us to us! There is a significant amount of utterly clever portmanteuing. My fave example was the tangled Siamese twin's illicit and unimaginable tale, told in a slippery and macabre bildungs-Geschichte. The book appeared the year after the publication of Barth's essay Lost in the Funhouse took these ideas to an extreme, for which it was both praised and condemned by critics. The first action was reading the book. Though many of the stories gathered here were published separately, there are several themes common to them all, giving them new meaning in the context of this collection. The tragic implications are felt through the realization that the choice between art and life of necessity excludes thereafter the one not chosen.
Buried beneath the lexical prestidigitation is a penchant for unconventional storytelling. Barth and Pynchon are often talked about as part of the same metafictional movement in this couple of decades, '60s and '70s. No kidding — I did the counting myself. Presumably it is the birth of the recurring character through some of the stories, Ambrose. Education: Hunter College High School, New York; Barnard College, Ne… Peter Carey , Carey, Peter Philip Nationality: Australian.
Perhaps, I did go to Johns Hopkins and I did meet Barth in another story in another life. He is not writing for you. The Legacy of David Foster Wallace. The layout of the story is weird. Two very brilliant stories and a whole kaboodle of indigestible bollocks. I can't imagine I've inspired anyone to read it.
Barth makes me sometimes regret my decision to not go to Johns Hopkins. A very philosophical sperm, at that, who says at near the end of the story, ''You who I may be about to become, what You are: with the last twitch of my real self I beg You to listen. But after tapping many the literary device in a string of doorstopper novels, he wanted to, by golly, get his fiction in those collections of short stories, the kind of books he always uses to teach from. What is it with this Greek tripe? It's all very well to dive into the deep end now and then, but I will only follow you so long as you have a good reason for being there. This collection is — it says here - a major landmark of experimental fiction. Nothing new that I can capture. Then I got into the character of Ambrose, who appears in a few stories.
I had to grit my teeth, take breaks, verb phrase preserving the series. Everything about Barth has already been transmitted, written about, alluded to, sketched on the soft walls of a thousand reflective uteruses by a million different swimming swimmers prior to drowning. Does it get any more minimal that that? Lost in the Funhouse is fucking brilliant--in that perfect, self-reflexive Pomo way--and beyond it even. Not sure if other work by John Barth is more readable, but this book has certainly cured me of any curiosity I may have harboured. You, dogged, uninsultable, print-oriented bastard, it's you I'm addressing, who else, from inside this monstrous fiction. During the car ride, they play games. Barth's lively, highly original collection of short pieces is a major landmark of experimental fiction.
INTRODUCTION · Lost & Found in the Funhouse: The John Barth Collection · Exhibits: The Sheridan Libraries and Museums
Should I take the time to deconstruct your stories, I suspect your only message is that life sucks and we will all die one day, in which case I must thank you for this highly original and important message that is worth taking the time to consider. I didn't like The Crying of Lot 49 much, I preferred Gravity's Rainbow. Was all that padding really necessary in the shoulders of our blazers? She'd think he did it!. Ambrose is eventually named after a swarm of bees hovers over him and his mother and he is not stung. Lost in the Funhouse is a post-modern collection of short stories published in 1963. In the course of the novel Giles carries out all the tasks prescribed by Joseph Campbell in The Hero with a Thousand Faces.
Buried beneath the lexical prestidigitation is a penchant for unconventional storytelling. It would be better to be the boyfriend, and act outraged, and tear the funhouse apart…. This is 201 pages long and it took me 11 days to read it and I mostly skimmed the last story because I couldn't find anything to hold onto. People are going to find this review inevitably off-putting, Sentimental Surrealist. In each piece, traditional stories from mythology are retold in a fresh way that pays homage to the original stories.
The analysis of this particular story is much more interesting in my humble opinion. I have nothing left to add. We haven't even reached ocean city yet: we will never get out of the funhouse. The author often pauses in mid-thought to point out the literary devices he is employing and how they agree or disagree with conventional fiction writing. My two favorite stories were Title and Autobiography, although the first time I read Autobiography I felt like I had been punched in the stomach because of the subject matter and the really frank intensity he allows himself to write with. I was mostly eager to jump to interesting fragments such as this: The reader! John Simmons Barth is an American novelist and short-story writer, known for the postmodernist and metafictive quality of his work.
