Good movie reviews. Really Good Movies You MUST Watch 2022-11-05
Good movie reviews Rating:
4,1/10
356
reviews
A good movie review is a critical analysis of a film that helps readers understand its strengths and weaknesses. It should not just summarize the plot, but also provide insight into the film's themes, characters, and techniques.
A good movie review should be well-written and informative. It should provide a clear and concise summary of the plot, but it should also delve deeper into the film's themes, characters, and techniques. A good review should provide context for the film and explain how it fits into the larger cinematic landscape.
It is also important for a movie review to be objective. While it is fine to express personal opinions and preferences, a good review should also consider the film's intended audience and consider how well it achieves its goals. A review should not simply declare a film "good" or "bad," but rather provide a nuanced analysis of its strengths and weaknesses.
In addition to providing a critical analysis, a good movie review should also be engaging and enjoyable to read. It should be written in a clear and concise manner, using vivid language and vivid examples to illustrate points.
Finally, a good movie review should be honest. It should not try to sugarcoat the film's flaws or exaggerate its strengths. Instead, it should provide a balanced and fair assessment of the film.
In conclusion, a good movie review is a critical analysis of a film that provides insight into its themes, characters, and techniques, while also considering its intended audience and providing a balanced and fair assessment of its strengths and weaknesses. It should be well-written, engaging, and honest.
Good (2008)
Death 105 Murder 104 Violence 96 Cult Film 91 Blood 88 Husband Wife Relationship 85 Flashback 81 Friendship 81 Title Spoken By Character 80 Kiss 78 Surprise Ending 77 Revenge 72 Corpse 68 Explosion 68 Male Protagonist 68 No Opening Credits 68 Father Son Relationship 67 Blockbuster 65 Slow Motion Scene 65 Cigarette Smoking 63 Fire 62 Knife 62 Father Daughter Relationship 61 Good Versus Evil 61 Car 60 Chase 60 Betrayal 59 Based On Novel 58 Photograph 58 Pistol 58 Shot To Death 58 Female Protagonist 57 Psychotronic Film 57 Rescue 57 Dog 56 Female Nudity 56 Mother Daughter Relationship 56 Deception 55 Falling From Height 55 Rain 55 Fear 54 Escape 52 Mother Son Relationship 51 Shot In The Chest 51 Gun 50 Police 50 Kidnapping 48 Fight 47 Lifting Someone Into The Air 47 Voice Over Narration 47 Blood Splatter 45 Crying 45 Family Relationships 45 Police Officer 45 Two Word Title 45 Anger 44 Dancing 43 Friend 43 Bare Chested Male 42 Cell Phone 42 Sex Scene 42 Watching Tv 42 Held At Gunpoint 41 Torture 41 Villain 41 Hospital 40 Man Wears Eyeglasses 39 F Word 38 Forest 37 Restaurant 36 Bar 35 Boyfriend Girlfriend Relationship 35 Investigation 35 Punched In The Face 35 Battle 34 Drunkenness 34 Machine Gun 33 Montage 33 Doctor 32 Shootout 32 Subjective Camera 32 Cigarette 31 Combat 31 First Part 31 Snow 31 Suspense 31 Telephone Call 31 Car Accident 30 Hero 30 Brother Sister Relationship 29 Girl 29 Helicopter 29 Male Female Relationship 29 Slapped In The Face 29 Anti Hero 28 Beating 28 Character Repeats Someone Else's Dialogue 28 Coming Of Age 28 Danger 28 Disguise 28. He is pulled in different emotional directions by his wife, mother, mistress and Jewish friend. . John Halder, a German literature professor in the 1930s, is initially reluctant to accept the ideas of the Nazi Party. Good has one, but only in a limited sense. I get that many Germans are adversed to acting in films about WWII, plus there's the whole language barrier thing, but when you've decided your Germans aren't going to speak German, why deem it necessary they speak the Queen's English? Taking place in Nazi Germany, the film looks at a professor and his growing relationship with the regime, and the disenchantment that follows. Suffice to say it's all a bit odd.
There were a lot of people there who did a lot of fucked up things, but they're all still human, making a generalisation that at the time all Germans were scum interested in nothing but their own personal gain because some of them saw all non-Germans as scum and they were interested in nothing but their own personal gain, is. None of these characters is nearly as richly drawn or interesting as Hildy and Frank, but increasingly, the story turns toward them and others. Lots of people in this world will shy away from Nazis in any way, shape or form. . In this life, he is a professor with no prospects of improving his career, his neurotic wife expects him to do everything, including taking care of their squabbling and inattentive children, and Halder's mother, a decrepit, sickly and senile old woman, who dedicates what's left of her life to making Halder feel miserable.
The scope is too confined for a film, or at least one that requires more breathing room than what it received here. You could give them any bloody accent you pleased! Once more, the film is too predictable and one-note, seeming to ignore the more interesting aspects of the story. . John Halder, a German literature professor in the 1930s, is initially reluctant to accept the ideas of the Nazi Party. The film is the tale of middle-aged academic, John Halder Viggo Mortensen; The Road, A History of Violence, the The Lord of the Rings trilogy, 1998's Psycho, The Prophecy, Leatherace: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III whom is swept up in the overwhelming changes going on in Germany during the late 1930's.
Dressed in a barn jacket and a knit Patriots hat, getting messy out on the water, Hildy finally appears to be where she belongs. Great performances and a cast that should have made this film much better. He then begins for himself a second life, he absconds with one of his young Aryan students to a flat in the city, after writing a novel which captures the attention of the Nazi elite, who are determined to have him become an honorary member of the party, with or without his approval. Having lofty themes and commentary is laudable, but it must accompany a narrative that's compelling in order to constitute a film. Not fantastic, not ground-breaking, it didn't change my life, it's not gonna hit my first rating above 9, it's just good. But there are worse ways to spend an afternoon than on a lobster boat in the shimmering sunshine with Sigourney Weaver and Kevin Kline. And I did find that on my second viewing it was all rather easy to follow.
Such is life when making a movie based on a stage-play, these sorts of things often do get lost in translation. We don't see enough of the inner-dynamics to truly care about them. Intentional or not I can't decide, but when the rank and file soldiers stand about like those British guards with the funny hats, all not reacting and stuff, kinda funny. Rotten Less than 60% of reviews for a movie or TV show are positive. Sorry for the lack of puns, I know there's a wealth of them for this film. It lacked an edge to it.
. The film clearly seeks deep emotions from us that it never earns. I mean, they were enemies in the war after all! Being in the SS allows Halder to become the head of his department at the University, he is given a brilliant house and a great paycheck, he can afford to move his domineering mother out to the country and hire her a full time maid, his children are only around on weekends, and they're ever so proud. Now playing in theaters. Which is quite the repertoire where he asks Halder to work for the Nazis to make "The case for an enlightened approach to mercy death on the grounds of humanity", which is just fucking hilarious to here come from the mouth of the Reichchancellory. Finally, there's this continuous shot through the a "Death Camp" I use the term loosely that goes on for ages which is very reminiscent of that scene from Children of Men. Well I'm sure you get the picture.
I think what I like most about Good is that it's not about how every German during the WWII era was inherently evil. He is pulled in different emotional directions by his wife, mother, mis. All in all Good is exactly that. The ending was atrocious and so dissatisfying. John Halder, a German literature professor in the 1930s, is initially reluctant to accept the ideas of the Nazi Party. Apply Tomatometer ® Close Certified fresh A special distinction awarded to the best reviewed movies and TV Shows.
It just seemed like I was following this random guys life during a difficult period in his country. It showed a lot about character and how normal innocent people of Germany really didn't know what was going on. The above being the first of them. Rotten Less than 60% of reviews for a movie or TV show are positive. I would never go so far as to call the film light hearted, but there are certain moments of what you might call humour. Had he be painted as more of an anti-hero, it would have been far more interesting. When his Jewish friend finds out he's been promoted, he automatically assumes that Halder joined the NSDAP, and rather than explain he's been made an honorary member of the SS against his will, and never actually signed up, he just tells his friend that if he cares so much he could always leave Germany.
Halder lives two lives, the first, is the life he begins with, and the life that he thinks he deserves. He is pulled in different emotional directions by his wife, mother, mistress and Jewish friend. And the best bit, Mark Strong has a supporting role Mark Strong's fucking awesome by the way, I was very pleased to see him in this, he plays, in uh, Robin Hood, Kick-Ass, Sherlock Holmes, RocknRolla, Sunshine and mother fucking Revolver! This brings me to my problems with Good. Halder never once defends his actions, although, that's rather an interesting point. People who've watched it will get what I mean. .
