Conclusion paragraph for gun control essay. Literature Reviews On Gun Control 2022-11-05
Conclusion paragraph for gun control essay Rating:
8,3/10
1892
reviews
In conclusion, gun control is a highly debated and controversial topic in the United States. While some argue that stricter gun control laws are necessary to reduce gun violence and keep communities safe, others argue that these laws infringe on the right to bear arms and do little to address the root causes of gun violence.
Despite these differences, there is some evidence to suggest that stricter gun control laws can be effective in reducing gun violence. For example, countries with stricter gun laws tend to have lower rates of gun violence, and states with stricter gun laws also tend to have lower rates of gun violence. However, it is important to recognize that gun control is just one aspect of a complex problem and that addressing the root causes of gun violence, such as poverty, inequality, and mental illness, is also crucial.
Ultimately, the decision on gun control will depend on the values and priorities of a given society. However, it is clear that finding a solution to gun violence is a pressing and urgent issue that requires the consideration of all viewpoints and a willingness to compromise. So, gun control laws should be implemented in a way that strikes a balance between protecting public safety and respecting the right to bear arms.
Gun Control Essay Examples (Pro and Against)
There are more guns than people. Works Cited Brent, David A. It can shape our future in such ways, because of how much we depend on a gun to get food, hunt, and protect ourselves. Reis and Vasilogambros confirm that the president has played a respectable role in fashioning the policy on gun control in the United States. The authors argue that rates of gun ownership are sky high in comparison to the shootings. The chief goal of these organizations is to treat gun violence as if it were a disease, treating it where it comes from — individual gun violence environments and the people involved in them. Despite the federal constitution affirming the right of Americans to own guns, it is noticeable that the ownership has to be checked to surety the safety of innocent Americans who are victims of the same legislation.
Moreover, congress should increase budgetary allotment for more recruiting of law enforcing agents in streets to curb the menace. They would also state that more should be done to combat mental health issues which could lead to mass shootings. This heated debate appears to be split evenly for and against firearm restrictions, with both sides arguing strongly for their case. On the rear, people argue in favour of gun control emphasising that possession of guns fosters homicides and suicides. This is palpable from the assertion of ensuring people own identified types of guns whereas other guns are banned from public reach, recruiting of more law enforcers to address the issue of gun control and checking of family background on a person before being allowed to own a gun. It was before the firearm act came into effect. These initiatives may serve as a good start to addressing the substantial problems of gun violence in America, and can be expanded or modified as needed if they prove to be ineffective or overbearing.
Despite the objectively terrible outcomes of gang violence, crime and shooting deaths, there are those who argue that enacting strict gun control would take away from a vital Constitutional right to bear arms. This can be done by adding subheadings and by making sure that each paragraph elaborates on only one point. It is threatening in this time as people nowadays are so hot headed that they do not even think for a second before taking any serious actions and this is the most significant reason why gun control is necessary. On one side of the discussion, there are people who argue that the gun control laws need to gain more restrictions and limitations? It became difficult to determine my side of the controversy due to there being a lot of negative and positive opinions about the issue. Strict policies must be created to stop this endless cycle of violence thousands of people have died but now together we have to stop others from dying as well.
The author concludes by affirming that the need of the public to be involved in the process is critical since the legislation will address their security issues. This is a very staggering statistic knowing that the U. When police respond to threats of shooters the police bring guns with them, why? See also Essay On Leadership Qualities Every person has the right to walk freely, have vacations with their families without the fear of being shot. The streets of America are now a war zone especially right here were we live. Spitzer, 2009 , affirms that guns play a fundamental role in molding of crimes both in the family and societal level. Those countries are the proof the rules work as they have the lowest gun death in the States. Research indicates a strong correlation between stricter gun control legislation and lower rates of gun-related deaths.
Guns have diverse negative impacts both on the family and societal level. In 1791 it was a person right to own or buy a gun because a lot of people were serving in the militia. The United States is first in gun crimes worldwide, and that needs to be changed. There are vague legal boundaries that have been set down thus far which answers some questions, but leave many more open Sanders. Despite of such differences, ease of purchasing guns are understandable by most of the people.
Introduction and conclusion to gun control Free Essays
A review of international and some domestic evidence. This quote from senator Rubio himself a future presidential candidate shows just how strongly opinionated he feels towards gun laws. Nell, 2012 , converses his support for the gun control program. The initial waiting period for buying a gun was five days, however, it was changed to an instant background check by a computer. This essay looks at some of the most robust reasons for a new system of gun control.
Different political sides have assumed hardline stands on the issue. Gun control policy being proposed by the government is merely to ensure that safety of both the Americans in possession of guns and those not in possessions is guaranteed. According to Giffords Law Center. Gun ownership can avert crime than cause more crime for a person that owns a gun. In America, this is very popular for a number of reasons. The ten day waiting period to purchase a firearm should be extended in addition to taking a psychological exam.
The author counter argues that implementing a stricter background check will be of no use. Most criminal activities are carried out with the help of firearm for instance, robbery and rape Lott, 25. The scholars have additionally avowed that for the secured and safe American society gun control policies should be enacted by the congress. The first is that when this amendment was made, our country was still weak and could barely ward off attacks. This is in turn has affected the social economic structure of the society.
