A constitution is a set of laws and principles that outlines the powers and duties of a government and establishes the rights and freedoms of its citizens. It is meant to be a foundational document that serves as a guiding light for the functioning of a state and ensures that its actions are in line with the values and principles of a society.
However, when a constitution is designed and implemented solely for the benefit of the few, rather than the general welfare of the society as a whole, it can have far-reaching and detrimental consequences. Such a constitution may be created and maintained by a small group of elites who seek to maintain their power and privilege at the expense of the majority.
In a system where the constitution is designed for the few, the rights and freedoms of the majority may be severely curtailed. The government may be empowered to take actions that benefit the elites at the expense of the general population, such as enacting policies that favor the interests of large corporations over those of ordinary citizens. The judicial system may also be biased in favor of the elites, providing them with legal protections and privileges that are not afforded to the rest of society.
Furthermore, a constitution for the few may lead to a lack of representation and accountability in government. The elites may use their power and influence to stack the deck in their favor, ensuring that they have a disproportionate amount of control over the decision-making process. This can lead to a lack of transparency and accountability, as the government may be more responsive to the interests of the elites rather than those of the general population.
In order to prevent a constitution from becoming a tool for the benefit of the few, it is essential that it be designed with the interests of the general population in mind. This can be achieved through a number of measures, such as the inclusion of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or groups, and the establishment of a system of representation that ensures that all voices are heard and taken into account. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the judicial system is impartial and that the rights and freedoms of all citizens are protected and upheld.
In conclusion, a constitution that is designed and implemented for the benefit of the few can have far-reaching and detrimental consequences for a society. It is essential that a constitution be designed with the interests of the general population in mind, and that it include measures to ensure transparency, accountability, and the protection of the rights and freedoms of all citizens.
Chapter 2
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers were not greedy, elitist, slave-beating, parasites. Though, the king did have to exercise this power with care and after consulting with his advisers Wikipedia. The fundamental test that should be applied to a new Constitution is whether it has the ability to provide the structural stability to free Sri Lanka from its debt trap, its perilous economic situation, its social inequities, and to move forward as a Nation that is proud of its people, its cultures and its languages. The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right. Thomas Jefferson advised that we "question with boldness even the existence of a god. The founders decided on a bicameral legislation, consisting of a House of Representatives elected every two years in its entirety, and a Senate with six-year staggered terms a third of the Senate to be elected every two years.
Constitution for Few
In truth, it was not their minds that were so much broader but their economic interests. Originally, the only portion of government directly elected by the people was the House of Representatives. In the interest of merchants and creditors, the states were prohibited from issuing paper money or imposing duties on imports and exports or interfering with the payment of debts by passing any "Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts. As their private communications show, it was a practical response to immediate material conditions, born of a common class interest. To survive, they frequently had to borrow money at high interest rates. In the interior of Virginia, seven individuals owned over 1.
A Constitution for the Few: The Masonic So
Even among those African Americans who had gained their freedom, in both the North and South, few were allowed to vote. A study of Delaware farms at about the time of the Constitutional Convention found that the typical farm family might have a large plot of land but little else, surviving in a one-room house or log cabin, no barns, sheds, draft animals, or machinery. Sri Lanka was pushed down from 'B2' high credit risk to 'Caa1' very high credit risk , as the coronavirus pandemic compounded its economic woes, Moody's said in a statement. No one could claim a life tenure on any elective office. . George Washington thought of him as a loose canon. Something is not right if the President of the country has to intervene to get a culvert done in a village or to get a leaking water pipe fixed.
A Constitution for the country or a few individuals?
Second, not only must the majority be prevented from finding horizontal cohesion, but its vertical force, its upward thrust upon government, should be blunted by interjecting indirect forms of representation. Some of the delegates were land speculators who invested in western holdings. Small farmers were burdened by heavy rents, ruinous taxes, and low incomes. Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports, and research papers in 2 minutes or less. While Sri Lanka struggles with Constitutions and amendments, it is noteworthy that the Colonial power that introduced formal Constitutions to Sri Lanka, Britain, operates without a written Constitution, but by an unwritten one formed of Acts of Parliament, court judgments and conventions. How should the executive be selected? Even Forrest McDonald, a conservative critic of Beard's interpretation, documents the opulent background of fifty-three of the fifty-five delegates; see his We, the People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958 , chapter 2. It is c and d that are usually ignored or denied by most historians.