"12 Angry Men" is a classic film that explores the dynamics of a jury deliberation room as they try to reach a verdict in a murder case. The film, set in the 1950s, follows the story of 12 jurors who are tasked with determining the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of killing his father.
As the deliberation process begins, it becomes clear that the jurors have a variety of different backgrounds and personalities, and that these differences will play a significant role in their ability to come to a unanimous verdict. Some of the jurors are convinced of the defendant's guilt from the outset, while others are more open-minded and willing to consider alternative explanations for the evidence presented.
As the discussion progresses, it becomes apparent that several of the jurors are biased in their thinking and are unwilling to consider the possibility that the defendant might be innocent. This leads to a contentious and heated debate, with some jurors becoming angry and confrontational as they try to persuade their fellow jurors of their position.
Despite the tension and conflict within the room, one juror, played by Henry Fonda, remains calm and collected, and he becomes the voice of reason as he patiently and thoughtfully examines the evidence and challenges the assumptions of his fellow jurors. Through his persistence and logical argument, he is able to convince the other jurors to carefully reconsider their positions, and eventually, several of them come around to his point of view.
In the end, the jurors reach a unanimous verdict of not guilty, and the film ends with a poignant moment as the jurors embrace and shake hands, united in their shared experience and the understanding that they have done their best to reach a fair and just decision.
Overall, "12 Angry Men" is a powerful and thought-provoking film that illustrates the importance of fair and open-minded deliberation in the justice system. It highlights the ways in which personal biases and prejudices can influence our thinking and decision-making, and it encourages viewers to carefully consider all sides of an argument before making a judgment. The film's timeless themes and its powerful performances by a talented cast make it a must-see for anyone interested in the justice system or the human psyche.
12 angry men paper
The majority of the film takes place in a jury room with the men never leaving the room from their deliberation responsibilities. Even though there was a lot of controversy in that jury room, I noticed that Jurors 3,7, and 9 used their personalities, beliefs, and views of their responsibilities to bring the boy on trial to justice. In fact, people have been shown to be more likely to remember what they expect to member seeing rather than what they truly see. Also, it may become a cause of the interpersonal friction between the employees. For eleven of the jurors the decision is apparent that the boy is guilty but for one juror, Mr.
12 Angry Men Free Essay Example
The differences among these people lead to miscommunication and misunderstanding that construct the most conflict within the movie. The cast and dialogue make this film memorable and the film has some clear moral issues that are addressed. Each cause can cause the conflict individually, or the conflict might result from multiple causes. They begin discussing the murder, and soon it is clear that the majority of the jurors believe the young man to be guilty and that they have no desire to sit and deliberate, they would rather talk about a baseball game, which starts at 7pm that evening. When he brought back the exact knife as the one used in the murder and told how easy it was to find one I think that would have been the last piece I needed to conclude there was reasonable doubt and to vote not guilty for my final vote. The film demonstrates the role that emotion plays in the aim of knowledge, if we can truly trust our sense to perceive what the world really is, and is arguing through reasoning significant? The case was a sad one and some of the other jurors were so cold —hearted. Or from getting stuck in endless debate.
12 Angry Men webapi.bu.edu
This right is particularly important based on the fact that the people determining your guilt or innocence should make a neutral decision, based on the facts of the case and what they feel is accurate, not how they see you as a person. One juror, who kept insisting on the guiltiness of the defendant till the end of the movie, is making his decision based on his negative past experience about his son. Juror 8 is the lone dissenter. Rose pursues the concept of prejudice, status, racial discrimination, arrogance, justice and the need for it to be served in the justice system. When the play ends the rain stops and the skies clear showing that the tension has been released and they have succeeded in breaking it. Convincing murder case and twelve routine jurors, just as the company is under-prepared and routine. .
