Hamlet, the titular character of William Shakespeare's play, is a complex and multi-faceted figure who has inspired much analysis and debate over the centuries. While it is impossible to say with certainty whether Hamlet would make a good king or not, it is possible to consider some of the characteristics he displays in the play and how they might affect his potential as a leader.
One of the most notable aspects of Hamlet's character is his intelligence and introspection. Throughout the play, he is shown to be a deeply thoughtful and reflective person, often wrestling with philosophical questions and grappling with moral dilemmas. This intellectual curiosity and self-examination could be seen as a positive trait in a leader, as it suggests a willingness to think critically and make informed decisions.
However, Hamlet's tendency towards indecision and procrastination could potentially be a hindrance to his effectiveness as a king. His famous soliloquy, "To be or not to be," reflects his struggle with the decision to take action against his uncle, who has murdered Hamlet's father and taken the throne. This hesitation and inability to make decisive choices could be seen as a weakness in a leader, who is expected to act quickly and decisively in times of crisis.
Another aspect of Hamlet's character that could potentially affect his suitability as a king is his emotional instability. Throughout the play, he exhibits a range of emotions, from grief and melancholy over his father's death to anger and resentment towards his uncle and mother. While these emotions are understandable given the circumstances, they could also be seen as a liability in a leader, who is expected to maintain a certain level of emotional stability and composure.
On the other hand, Hamlet's strong sense of morality and justice could be seen as a positive trait in a leader. Throughout the play, he is shown to be deeply concerned with upholding the moral order and seeking justice for his father's murder. This commitment to justice and righteousness could be seen as an important quality in a leader, who is responsible for upholding the laws and values of the society they serve.
In conclusion, it is difficult to say definitively whether Hamlet would make a good king or not. While he displays some characteristics that could be seen as positive traits in a leader, such as intelligence, a strong sense of morality, and a commitment to justice, he also exhibits weaknesses such as indecision, procrastination, and emotional instability. Ultimately, whether or not Hamlet would make a good king would depend on a variety of factors and is open to interpretation.
Does Hamlet Make A Good King Essay
He gives his dying vote to Fortinbras: He has my dying vote, Tell him so, with the news, more and less, Which has been asked for. When he says this, the meaning behind it is a pun about the incestuous relationship between Gertrude and Claudius. Hamlet would have been a better ruler because throughout the play he demonstrated how smart he was, how he thought things out before acting, how he questions things to find the truth and how he is a better person than Claudius. This makes Hamlet not trust anyone that he Compare And Differences Of Banquo Vs. He constantly scrutinizes himself with malice. Not only had Hamlet spoken to his mother about her poor choices, but he also had yet to kill Claudius. There cannot be a strong country without a strong king.
Why didn't Hamlet become king?
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/3159417-56a85e915f9b58b7d0f24f46.jpg)
This subreddit is for discussion of fiction using information about the universe and not meta information about the work. William Shakespeare Hamlet is read attentively, and no details are disregarded, it becomes evident that William Shakespeare included in it something quite different Religion in Hamlet Essay The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, is one of the most famous tragedies William Shakespeare has ever written. This character flaw is evident in his dealings with Claudius is a politician through and through. Along the way things are unpredictable. Hamlet choosing not to kill King Claudius while he is praying, only prolongs King Cladius" death. And so he goes to heaven. Especially where there is a king, as in the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, because a king is in charge of the whole community.
Would Hamlet Make A Good King Analysis
You already know Bruce Wayne is Batman, you already know Darth Vader is Anakin Skywalker, you already know Sauron is evil. Fortinbras gives him a respected soldier's burial: Bear Hamlet like a soldier to the platform, For he was likely, had he been King, To have proved most royal, and, for his passage, The soldiers' music and the rites of war will Speak loudly for him. In general, most people think no— Another question we have to ask is whether Hamlet was deserving of the crown in the first place? Hamlet's major characteristic, his inability to act without almost total certitude that he was doing the "right" thing would have made him a very indecisive, and perhaps very ineffectual king. Up, sword, and know thou a more horrid hent. In the play Hamlet many people have different opinions on the main character Hamlet.
Why would Hamlet make a bad king?
Although he might have had some misgivings before committing the deed, at the decisive moment, he killed his own brother. It's like Ask Science, but all questions and answers are written with answers gleaned from the universe itself. Even though this spirit is right in front of him and has done nothing to either Horatio or the other men who have seen him, Hamlet is still unable to automatically assume that this spirit is a good spirit. Claudius is victualing into Hamlet 's suspicion by sending people to Hamlet and ascertain what he knows. Hamlet is seeking to fully grasp his own emotional sense of identity and in wrestling with this, I think that failures on a political level would be evident. When Hamlet has immediate suspicious of his fathers murder and later proof, he delays the murder, which is puzzling because the play is about revenge, and one would expect him to have done it earlier as he had ample amount of opportunities to do so. Hamlet is obviously very emotional and prone to massive mood swings, but he's also a prince who must have gotten the best education possible, and has friends and contacts in multiple countries.
Hamlet Made A Good King In William Shakespeare's Hamlet
Judging by his past, he would think it through and make sure that X country deserved to be attacked. In the same speech, Claudius says: "Nor have we herein barr'd your better wisdoms, which have freely gone with this affair along", which suggests that the marriage was approved, perhaps even encouraged, by the gathered nobility. A Barkovs Hamlet: A Tragedy of Errors Essay William Shakespeare authorship: The text of Hamlet contains indications that Shakespeare portrayed himself as an allegedly dead university graduate. In short, he looks before he leaps. However, if you choose to roleplay, please remember that you must answer as if you had all the information available to a member of the audience.
Hamlet Would of Made a Good King
As seen in the play, Hamlet can duel Laertes, and kills him through the end of the play. The short answer is that Considering that Hamlet alienates himself from many of those around him his mother, But, if we consider that Hamlet becomes king after killing If Hamlet, upon becoming king, learns to use diplomacy rather than feigning madness while negotiating his own delay over-thinking with efficiency, he would make a very good king. He knows nobody is around and that it would be very simple for him to kill Claudius, who has his back towards him. Again, there are numerous examples of poor political leadership on the part of individuals who could not sort out their own emotional challenges in a clear and focused manner. Hamlet also has the qualities of a good friend. Or the same guy in an otherwise empty Wembley as England have just gone a goal down versus Germany.
