Why the electoral college should not be abolished. Why the Electoral College Will Not be Abolished 2022-10-26

Why the electoral college should not be abolished Rating: 6,5/10 441 reviews

The Electoral College is a system used in the United States to elect the President and Vice President. It is a controversial system that has been the subject of much debate over the years, with some arguing that it should be abolished in favor of a more direct system of election. However, there are several good reasons why the Electoral College should not be abolished.

First and foremost, the Electoral College helps to ensure that the President is elected by a broad coalition of support. In a direct popular vote system, candidates could focus on campaigning in heavily populated urban areas and ignore the needs and concerns of rural areas. This could result in a President who is not representative of the entire country and who may not have the support of a significant portion of the population.

In contrast, the Electoral College requires candidates to campaign in a variety of states and to appeal to a diverse group of voters. This ensures that the President has a broad base of support and is representative of the entire country.

Additionally, the Electoral College helps to protect against the potential for fraud or manipulation of the election. A direct popular vote system could be vulnerable to efforts to sway the outcome through illegal means, such as voter intimidation or ballot stuffing. The Electoral College, on the other hand, has built-in safeguards to ensure the integrity of the election.

Another reason to keep the Electoral College is that it helps to balance the power of large and small states. In a direct popular vote system, candidates would likely focus their efforts on highly populated states, ignoring the concerns of smaller states. The Electoral College gives small states a proportionally larger say in the election, ensuring that their interests are not overlooked.

Finally, the Electoral College has a long history in the United States and has been a fundamental part of our democracy for more than two centuries. While it may have its flaws, it has proven to be a reliable and effective system for electing the President. Abolishing it would require a significant overhaul of our electoral system and could lead to unintended consequences.

In conclusion, the Electoral College should not be abolished. It helps to ensure that the President is elected by a broad coalition of support, protects against the potential for fraud or manipulation, balances the power of large and small states, and has a long and successful history in the United States. While it may be tempting to consider alternatives, it is important to consider the potential consequences and to carefully weigh the pros and cons before making any changes to such a crucial aspect of our democracy.

Why the Electoral College Will Not be Abolished

why the electoral college should not be abolished

American citizens are more politically literate, or are voting for things they genuinely believe in. But reforming the Electoral College does not rank high among our national problems. This is part of the reason the Electoral College was put in place, it was considered vitally important to maintain stability in the government. Get Help With Your Essay If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help! When the vote is that close, does it really matter who wins? This essay proves it should. Listen to a 2.


Next

5 Reasons to Abolish the Electoral College

why the electoral college should not be abolished

Having the states play an autonomous role in presidential elections, it is said, reinforces the division of governing authority between the nation and the states. And I think this allows us to get back to what the Founding Fathers had in mind. To that end, there were 2 separations of powers: The major separation of power was Fed vs. . Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Here, again, there are three main points to make.

Next

The Nation: The January 6 committee dropped the ball by not calling for the Electoral College to be abolished

why the electoral college should not be abolished

Because of their anti-federalist, pooh-pooh-ing of the anti-tyranny position. One mistake a lot of people make in understanding me is to attribute normative views to me based on my positive analysis. That means centrist ideas tend to be the ones that receive the most traction instead of the individual priorities of platforms on the extreme left or right. So should the electoral college be abolished? Most obviously, it forces candidates to spread their campaigning and interest outside of just cities or outside of just a few states since, once the state is won, there is no more gain in pandering to them any more. Having a state-based system for electing both houses of Congress should be adequate to that task.

Next

Should We Abolish the Electoral College?

why the electoral college should not be abolished

Maine and Nebraska, which allocate a portion of their electoral votes by congressional district, have so few electors that their divergence from common practice is unlikely to matter. More constitutional amendments have been proposed about changing the Electoral College than about any other subject. Florida was a case study in why you want an Electoral College. Here are the yea and the nay. If we think in terms of marginal value rather than average value, the marginal voter in a swing state has more value than the marginal voter in a non-swing state. Jeremy Stahl, "This Team Thinks They Can Fix the Electoral College by 2024," slate.

Next

The electoral college is an outdated system that needs to be abolished

why the electoral college should not be abolished

What if, for example, the devastation of New Orleans had happened on Election Day, should all those people that would have been unable to vote not get a say in the outcome of the election? We should be talking about other things. Critics of the system would argue that the elections of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump are evidence that this impact is no longer present in U. That probably promotes a more national and less regional vision. The new system in which we choose to replace the electors or the Electoral College is what this country needs to come to a consensus on. The following five reasons to abolish the Electoral College are offered by supporters of using a different approach to presidential elections.

Next

[Solved] The electoral college should not be abolished

why the electoral college should not be abolished

Without the electoral college, groups such as Iowa farmers and Ohio factory workers would be ignored in favor of pandering to metropolitan areas with higher population densities, leaving rural areas and small towns marginalized. If, say, environmental sustainability or abortion or the Second Amendment is your dominant concern, it does not matter whether you live in Wyoming or California, Pennsylvania or Delaware. They need to create a coalition, which means that they need to pay attention to all the states — or at a minimum, most of the states. We need to think hard, and quickly, about how to reform three aspects of the presidential nomination process: the debates, the primary elections and the conventions. .

Next

Why We Should Never (Ever) Abolish The Electoral College

why the electoral college should not be abolished

Clara Wheeler, vice chairwoman of the State Board of Elections in Virginia, Americans seeking to improve the presidential election system and see that less competitive states are not ignored should reform, not abolish, the Electoral College. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Two weeks ago it gave us Donald Trump, although Clinton will most likely have a more than two million vote edge among those who cast ballots. It creates 50 individual contests. In a homogeneous society governed by majority rule, every individual would have an equal voice in making decisions or laws.

Next

Electoral College Pros and Cons

why the electoral college should not be abolished

According to CNN, in the 2016 election, Hilary Clinton the popular vote by about 3 million votes. It also stops the distribution process where California gets 55 votes, but a state like Delaware only gets 3. With the Electoral College, the median voter is the median voter in states like Florida, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Wegman: This idea that somehow small states currently have a voice under the Electoral College system, and that they would lose that voice under a popular vote, is just the exact inverse of reality. In Maryland the Republican candidate will have no chance to win while the opposite is true in Mississippi. Politicians would quickly realize that if they won the vote in the 10 most populous states or the 50 most populous cities, they could win the election. Campaigns would focus on large, voter-rich metropolitan areas and media markets, and on appeals to national demographic and occupational groups.

Next