The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the practice of executing individuals who have been convicted of certain crimes. While it has been used throughout history in various societies, the modern era has seen a trend towards the abolition of the death penalty in many countries. There are a number of reasons why the death penalty is wrong and should be abolished.
One of the main reasons the death penalty is wrong is that it is a form of cruel and unusual punishment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment, and the death penalty clearly falls into this category. Executing someone is a violent and final act that cannot be undone, and it is not a humane way to deal with crime.
Another reason the death penalty is wrong is that it is often applied disproportionately to certain groups of people. Studies have shown that the death penalty is disproportionately applied to people of color, particularly African Americans. This is due in part to systemic biases within the criminal justice system, which can lead to wrongful convictions and sentencing. The death penalty is therefore not only cruel and unusual, but it is also unfairly applied and perpetuates social injustice.
There is also significant evidence that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime. Many studies have shown that states with the death penalty have no lower rates of crime than states without it. This suggests that the death penalty is not a necessary or effective tool in preventing crime.
Furthermore, the death penalty is expensive and inefficient. The process of appealing a death sentence and carrying out an execution can take many years and cost millions of dollars. This is a significant drain on resources that could be better used elsewhere, such as investing in prevention and rehabilitation programs.
In conclusion, the death penalty is wrong for a number of reasons. It is a form of cruel and unusual punishment that is disproportionately applied to certain groups of people. It is also not an effective deterrent to crime and is a costly and inefficient use of resources. There are better ways to address crime and ensure justice, such as investing in prevention and rehabilitation programs. The death penalty should be abolished.
The Controversy of Death Penalty
This is insane because there are alternatives to death, such as a lifelong prison sentence in a high-security prison. In opposition, some of the cons are cost of execution, humanity, morality, religion, and unnecessary pain for the family of the executed prisoner. There does not seem to be a conclusion. Since the very beginning of civilization, this definition has conflicted profoundly with the 8th Amendment rights of the U. However, similar to many other methods of execution, miscalculations and unforeseen errors during the process of lethal injection can lead to an unintentionally prolonged and painful demise for those subjected to it 's wrath. It was established centuries ago and has been accepted by society. Imagine you are accused of murder.
Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay
The author describes how there has been fluctuations in the general population opinion regarding the death penalty since its reintroduction in 1976. In my research, one argument in favor of the use of capital punishment has always stood out as the most solid: that it serves as a crime deterrent and will save more lives than we kill. No man should be put to death, even as an example, if he can be left to live without danger to society. Spectators that have witnessed an execution say that watching an execution has changed their lives. In 2000, Professor James Liebman from Columbia Law School released a study that examined every capital conviction and appeal between 1973-1995. This is important because it shows factual stats about how much these cases cost vs regular cases and how much money could be saved if the death penalty was eliminated. According to the Pro death penalty people, death penalty can lessen heinous crime rates such as rape and murder.
Abolishing The Death Penalty Thesis Example
This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. According to study on CNN in 2014, convicts are sixty percent more likely to be raped in jail than out of jail. Human rights activists have come forward to argue that despite the crimes committed, all people need. It could be only a minority of citizens who approved to impose it; which would not imply that, then, it should not be imposed. Bruck develops this hypothesis by countering all pro-death penalty arguments with previous cases and specific statistics that apply to the argument.
