A compare and contrast paragraph is a type of paragraph that is used to analyze and evaluate the similarities and differences between two things. This type of paragraph is often used in academic writing, particularly in essays, to help readers better understand the relationship between different concepts or ideas.
One effective way to write a compare and contrast paragraph is to use a block format, in which all the information about one thing is presented before moving on to the information about the other thing. In this format, the writer first introduces the topic and then presents a list of similarities and differences between the two things being compared.
For example, consider the following compare and contrast paragraph:
"Cats and dogs are both popular pets, but they have many differences as well as some similarities. Cats are generally smaller and more independent than dogs, and they do not require as much attention or exercise. However, both animals can be trained to do tricks and can provide their owners with companionship. In terms of appearance, cats have sleek fur and are known for their agility, while dogs have a wider range of coat types and are known for their loyalty. Overall, while cats and dogs have some similarities, they also have many differences that make them unique and suitable for different types of pet owners."
In this paragraph, the writer first introduces the topic of comparing cats and dogs and then presents a list of both similarities and differences between the two animals. The writer also provides specific examples to illustrate the points being made, making the paragraph more informative and engaging for the reader.
Overall, a compare and contrast paragraph can be a useful tool for analyzing and evaluating the similarities and differences between two things. By organizing the information in a clear and logical way, a writer can help readers understand the relationship between the two things being compared and make informed decisions or conclusions.
Engineering Failures: St. Francis Dam
Laitance was allowed to stay in place between each concrete lift. Reports suggest that there were no geologists in the team of this project and no outside party was consulted to review the safety of the location Geiger, 1928. University of Oklahoma Press. Power was quickly restored via tie-lines with Near 1:00 a. David Rogers, 2013 AEG Shlemon Specialty Conference. Additionally, it was disclosed that even though Mulholland claimed that the factor of safety of his design was 4, it was surprisingly estimated to less than 1 Association of State Dam Safety Officials, n. Notwithstanding the fact that the failure of the St.
St. Francis Dam (California, 1928)
It remained at 1832 for three weeks before the BWWS began withdrawing water again for the 1927 summer season and fluctuated between elevations 1813 and 1819 for the rest of the year. Additionally, the state was given full authority to supervise the maintenance and operation of all non-federal dams. This was supported by a chart made by the automatic water level recorder located on the dam's center section. Many more failures - in Arizona, Tennessee, Oregon, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and elsewhere across the U. Francis Dam after the collapse, dated March 1928. It can result in the impairment of many other infrastructure systems, such as roads, bridges, and water systems.
St. Francis Dam webapi.bu.edu
What year was the last dam built in California? Young to investigate the failure. Oscar Wilson, Andy Alias O. They found the leak to be running clear — the muddy appearance was due to contact with soil as it exited the dam. Although the BWWS had designed and built a number of dams by this time, all but one the previous dams had been embankment dams and none had been anywhere as big as the proposed St Francis Dam. Although this investigation was insightful and informative, the theory, along with others which hypothesized an appreciably increasing amount of seepage just prior to the failure, becomes less likely when it is compared against the eyewitness accounts of the conditions in the canyon and near the dam during the last thirty minutes before its collapse. The Board was charged with reviewing documents and recommending the final site for the proposed dam.