Sonnet 67. Thoughts and More: Sonnet 67 2022-10-17
Sonnet 67 Rating:
5,6/10
688
reviews
Sonnet 67 is a poem written by William Shakespeare that explores the theme of aging and the passage of time. The sonnet is structured in the traditional Shakespearean form, with 14 lines written in iambic pentameter and a rhyme scheme of abab cdcd efef gg.
The poem begins with the speaker lamenting the fact that he is growing old and his beauty is fading. He compares himself to a "death-bed" on which he lies, waiting for the end to come. The speaker feels that he has been robbed of his youth and vitality, and he laments that time has taken its toll on his physical appearance.
In the second quatrain, the speaker turns his attention to the passage of time and its effects on the natural world. He compares the seasons to a "bald, naked forked animal" that "casts his skin," suggesting that even nature is subject to the ravages of time. The speaker also compares the passing of the seasons to the "death-bed" on which he lies, further emphasizing the connection between aging and death.
In the third quatrain, the speaker reflects on the way that time has changed his circumstances. He says that he has lost his friends and his wealth, and he is now "desolate" and alone. The speaker feels that he has been abandoned by the world and is left to face his own mortality.
In the final couplet, the speaker concludes the sonnet with a hopeful note. Despite his despair at the prospect of his own death, he finds solace in the thought that his "fair truth" and "beauty" will live on in the words of his poetry. The speaker believes that his poetry will be a testament to his life and will preserve his legacy long after he is gone.
Overall, Sonnet 67 is a powerful meditation on the theme of aging and the passage of time. Shakespeare uses vivid imagery and metaphor to explore the way that time affects the natural world and the human experience, and he ultimately offers a hopeful message about the enduring power of art and literature.
Sonnet 67 is a poem written by William Shakespeare that reflects on the fleeting nature of time and the impact it has on the speaker's own sense of self.
In the opening lines of the poem, the speaker laments the passage of time, saying that "Ah, how soon hath Time, the subtle thief of youth, / Stol'n on his wing my three and twentieth year!" The speaker is lamenting the fact that they are now 23 years old, and that time has stolen their youth from them. This theme of the passage of time and its impact on the speaker's own sense of self is a common one throughout Shakespeare's sonnets, and it is something that the speaker grapples with throughout the poem.
As the poem progresses, the speaker reflects on the way in which time has changed them, saying "For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright, / Who art as black as hell, as dark as night." The speaker is saying that they once thought of themselves as beautiful and bright, but now they see themselves as being as dark and as black as hell. This reflects the way in which time can change our perceptions of ourselves and the world around us.
Despite this, the speaker does not give up hope, saying "But be contented: when that fell arrest / Without all bail shall carry me away, / My life hath in this line some interest, / Which for memorial still with thee shall stay." The speaker is saying that although they will eventually die, their memory will live on in the lines of this poem, and they will be remembered by the person to whom the poem is addressed.
In conclusion, Sonnet 67 is a poignant reflection on the passage of time and its impact on the speaker's sense of self. It is a reminder of the fleeting nature of life, and the importance of making the most of the time we have.
Sonnet 67
Sonnet 67 questions why Nature allows false things to mimic the beloved's beauty and goodness, and how the beloved can even remain alive in such a den of sin as this world. O, him she stores, to show what wealth she had In days long since, before these last so bad. It appeared to be saying that the subject is so beautiful that he lends credence to lesser around him simply by the virtue of him being close — whether it be men or nature itself. Ah, wherefore with infection should he live, And with his presence grace impiety, That sin by him advantage should achieve And lace itself with his society? The 1609 Quarto sonnet 67 version AH wherefore with infection ſhould he liue, And with his preſence grace impietie, That ſinne by him aduantage ſhould atchiue, And lace it ſelfe with his ſocietie? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952. The last quadrant depicts a scene where the deer is captured "half trembling" yet "fearless".
Why should false painting imitate his cheek, And steal dead seeing of his living hue? Why should the less beautiful be falsely represented as roses when he is a true rose? The Sense of Shakespeare's Sonnets. On account of their seeming beauty, which, however, is not caused by "blood blushing through lively veins. The Works of Shakespeare: Sonnets. Ah, wherefore with infection should he live And with his presence grace impiety, That sin by him advantage should achieve And lace itself with his society? They are written in a very intricate form, with an interlocking rhyme scheme. Why should poor beauty indirectly seek Roses of shadow, since his rose is true? Shakespeare Sonnet 67 - Ah, wherefore with infection should he live directory search SONNET 67 Ah, wherefore with infection should he live, And with his presence grace impiety, That sin by him advantage should achieve, And lace itself with his society? This image demonstrates the victory that the speaker holds in his chase for the prey, who has walked up to him and given itself over to him. Why should others use makeup to imitate his face, And make lifeless copies from his living color? Over all of this the sonnet is delivered in narration. On the Literary Genetics of Shakspeare's Sonnets.
Maybe it was just me but I was lost. The world being such as was represented in the 3. In the film a female character stares out the window having just checked her phone it appears ; she ties her hair up, walks downstairs with two phone, finds an older one on the table, has a last look around, and leaves. Why should he live, now Nature bankrupt is, Beggar'd of blood to blush through lively veins? Perhaps the way I struggled with both is the issue, because I really didn't get the sonnet. Maybe he did get it out — but for this viewer it didn't work at all.
Sonnet 67: Ah! Wherefore With Infection Should He Live✔️
Even after reading the helpful text on the Sonnet Project page and going back to the sonnet for another time, I struggled to find the meaning in the words that others did. The prey comes to the hunter by its own free will, ironic since this is at a point where the hunter has given up his pursuit. The Pelican Shakespeare Rev. It didn't help that I went into the film with this on me; or that I really don't know too much more about Edgar Allen Poe than what Simpsons and Homicide: Life on the Street have taught me this film is set in his old cottage. More to Explore Mr. She has no treasury now other than his, And, admired by many, she lives on his profits. For she hath no exchequer now but his, And proud of many, lives upon his gains.
Why ſhould he liue,now nature banckrout is, Beggerd of blood to bluſh through liuely vaines, For ſhe hath no exchecker now but his, And proud of many,liues vpon his gaines? If the goal was to get me to watch the film again and also read the sonnet then it achieved both goals because the film seemed to have no connection to anything that I knew I must be totally missing something. For she hath no exchequer now but his, And, proud of many, lives upon his gains. The prey in the poem is the woman which Spenser is courting, at first showing no interest in his pursuit and escaping from him. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1950. Why should poor beauty indirectly seek Roses of shadow, since his rose is true? The second quadrant then illustrates how the prey, a deer, returns to where he sits to "quench her thirst".
Sonnet 57: Being your slave, what should I do but…
Also, the idea of wanting what one cannot attain is seen clearly throughout the poem, first with the hunter, and then with the prey once it realizes it is no longer being chased, returning to the hands of the hunter. In sonnet 67, the first quadrant describes the "weary chase", where the hunter would sit down "with panting hounds, beguiled of their prey". Why should shallow paintings be allowed to imitate his features, resulting in lifeless copies of his vital beauty? The hunter is discouraged from his chase, sitting under the shade to rest after a long, weary journey. For she hath no exchequer now but his, And, proud of many, lives upon his gains. Okay he made me read the sonnet probably 20 times and watch the film 4 times, but this was more driven by the work I had to do to even try to understand — not that it was compelling.
Shakespeare Sonnet 67 Analysis, Ah, wherefore with infection should
O him she stores, to show what wealth she had In days long since, before these last so bad. Sonnet 67 questions why Nature allows false things to mimic the beloved's beauty and goodness, and how the beloved can even remain alive in such a den of sin as this world. Ah, why should he live with contamination, And grace impiety itself with his presence, That sin should use him to take advantage And decorate itself with his company? This demostrates the speaker's victory in his pursuit of the "game from him escaped away" earlier in the poem. O him ſhe ſtores,to ſhow what welth ſhe had, In daies long ſince,before theſe laſt so bad. For she hath no exchequer now but his, And, proud of many, lives upon his gains.
The same victory is seen between Spenser and the woman he courted, Elizabeth Boyle, who later on in life became his wife. The film will stay with me, but not for good reasons — maybe I'll "get it" someday, but for now it eludes me totally and, judging by the presentation style, I'd guess that is totally fine with the makers of this one! Why should he live, now nature bankrupt is, Beggared of blood to blush through lively veins? Beauty indifferent and imperfect. Lyke as a huntsman after weary chace, Seeing the game from him escapt away: sits downe to rest him in some shady place, with panting hounds beguiled of their pray, So after long pursuit and vaine assay, when I all weary had the chace forsooke, the gentle deare returnd the selfe-same way, thinking to quench her thirst at the next brooke. . Why should poor beauty indirectly seek Roses of shadow, since his rose is true? Spenser must have ultimately stopped "chasing" her for her to realize how much she cared for him. This demonstrates how after the hunter has given up his pursuit and sits down to rest, the deer comes back to him to fulfill its own needs.
O him she stores, to show what wealth she had In days long since, before these last so bad. Lace itself with his society. I was born and grew up in Northern Ireland and my father, typical of the region, had a way about it; when we would watch things that had an unexplained twist, unsatisfying conclusion or weird ending, he would give a verbal shrug of "aye, well" and probably not have much more to say after that. Why should false painting imitate his cheek, And steal dead seeing of his living hue? Sonnet 67 in modern English Ah, why should he have to be surrounded by corruption, gracing sinners with his presence, only to be taken advantage of by them? Why ſhould ſalſe painting immitate his cheeke, And ſteale dead ſeeing of his liuing hew? Why should false painting imitate his cheek, And steal dead seeing of his living hue? And precisely where he is greatest, in the sublime ruin of the tragedies, love between the sexes has on the whole a subordinate place, and is there is most often fraught, as we have seen, with disaster and frustration. These interlocked situations, a reaction from one action leading to another, are emphasized with Spenser's intricate rhyme scheme. Why should he live now that nature is bankrupt, Lacking the blood to blush through living veins? Spenserian sonnets are based on Edmund Spenser's courtship of Elizabeth Boyle.
