Writing an essay arguing against a particular perspective or idea can be a challenging task, as it requires you to present a well-reasoned and persuasive argument that counters the perspective or idea being presented. One of the key components of a successful argument against a particular perspective or idea is the use of credible and reliable sources to support your position.
When selecting articles to use as evidence in your argument against a particular perspective or idea, it is important to consider their credibility and reliability. This means looking for articles that are written by experts in the field or that are published in reputable sources. It is also important to consider the biases and motivations of the authors of the articles you are using, as these can influence the way in which the information is presented.
In addition to using credible and reliable sources, it is also important to carefully evaluate the evidence presented in the articles you are using. This includes considering the methods used to gather and analyze the data, as well as the limitations and potential biases of the study. By thoroughly evaluating the evidence, you can strengthen your argument by showing that the perspective or idea you are arguing against is not supported by the best available evidence.
Finally, it is important to present your argument in a clear and logical manner, using strong reasoning and evidence to support your position. This may include providing counterarguments to the perspective or idea you are arguing against and refuting these counterarguments with your own evidence and reasoning.
In conclusion, writing an essay arguing against a particular perspective or idea requires the use of credible and reliable sources, careful evaluation of the evidence presented, and strong reasoning and argumentation. By following these guidelines, you can effectively present a well-reasoned and persuasive argument against a particular perspective or idea.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
In each area, she reframes the conventional attitudes and strategies of city planners with her own observations, pointing out how planners have misunderstood the nature of the problems they are trying to solve and have consequently caused more harm than good. Most of her observations surround New York City, Boston, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. Districts must serve mixed use functions to activate the streets at different times of the day. Retrieved 3 August 2012. She was an activist and a student who understood the system but wasn't wedded to it or dependent on it for a living.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities Free Essay Example
He would have various al ternative routes to choose. We must tirst of all drop any ideal o neighborhoods as self-contained or introverted units. Indeed, the whole idea of housing projects sounds like a recipe for disaster: pack all the poor into one area, set income limits so anyone successful has to move out, discourage all street activity to eliminate a sense of community. . Summary Jane Jacobs, in her book, shows how modern cities must undergo a sort of death before they can rise to new glories.
Review: The Death and Life of Great American Cities
The population itself must be cartelized, with pt9ple moved from the province of one cartel to another on the basi{of the money they make. She seemed much less interested in public transport and less keen on public housing than I imagine her contemporaries in Europe might have been. For all our conformity, we are too adventurous, inquisitive. The social structure of the sidewalk hinges partly on so called self-appointed public figures. And yet planning over decades has worked to destroy all this. This is one area where Jacobs' recommendations were possibly useful, as the federal government has incorporated many of her ideas to subsidize low-income tenants in private housing, rather than in monolithic government-owned housing sites.
The Architectural Student: Jane Jacobs: The Life and Death of Great American Cities
That is truly a tragedy for it is full of brilliant and insightfully practical suggestions on how to improve both. . On the contrary, they represent a complex and highly developed form of order. Chatham Village, that Piusburgh modd of Garden City life, is as thoroughly marriarchaJ in conception and in operation as the newest dormitory suburb. Forest Park in St. As a body of work, it is amazing and I adore Jane Jacobs.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs
· btely a few planners, notably Rcgin:l. In order for the street to have a diversity of merchants, it needs varied prices of rent -- only chains can afford completely new builds. Even the most urbane citizen docs care about the atmosphere of the street and district where he lives, no maHer how much choice he has of pursuits outside it; and the common run of city people do depend greatly 01. Suggestion--the part standing for the whole-is a principal means by which art communicates; this is why art often tells us so much with such eC{ nomy. Its internal planning runs largely to long, isolated walks without effective centers. Some city sidewalks are undoubtedly evil places for rearing children.
Citation: The death and life of great American cities
However, a good portion of this book still manages to be dull, despite being very important. Whatever adult society does ac company the daily life of children affected by such planning has be a matriarchy. For a street to be safe, it needs life. A 'city's very structure consists. Pan of their charm is the accompanying sense of freedom to roam up and down the sidewalks, a different matter from being boxed into a preserve. This said, I constantly asked myself "where is the science? To house people in this · planned fashion, price tags are fastened on the population.
The Life and Death of Great American Cities
Consider, as an illustration. Rather, trust can be created with sidewalk contact and safety. You begin by making apartment buildings from 5 to 11 floors, depending on the surrounding area. Jacobs emphasizes that city sidewalks should be considered in combination with physical environment surrounding sidewalks. Jane Jacobs' book The Death and Life of Great American Cities has been on my mental to-read list since I read Jacobs view of the city struck me as Darwinian - the more life there is, the more life there can be.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs: 9780679644330
Gndy Clay, William C. There comes a point, at increased levels of complication, when actual invention is required" p. As she put it, "A city sidewalk by itself is nothing. Jacobs uses sidewalks as an example; while she acknowledges that wide sidewalks are needed in cities to promote the efficient movement of people from one place to another, she also makes the assertion that sidewalks are in some instances pipelines of illegal activity, as they allow nefarious individuals to mingle and move along with the honorable city dwellers. I guess this was kinda true somewhat recently? Being human, human beings are what interest us most. She went on to talk about parks and how parks should posses four characteristics: intricacy, centering, sun, and enclosure.
