Ibn taymiyya against the greek logicians. Staff View: Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians / :: Library Catalog Search 2022-11-08
Ibn taymiyya against the greek logicians
Rating:
8,7/10
1298
reviews
Ibn Taymiyya was a 13th century Islamic scholar and theologian who is known for his criticisms of the Greek logicians and their influence on Islamic thought. In his writings, he argued that the Greek logicians had a flawed understanding of the nature of reality and that their philosophical systems were incompatible with the teachings of Islam.
One of the main criticisms that Ibn Taymiyya had of the Greek logicians was that they relied too heavily on reason and logic, rather than on divine revelation, to understand the world. According to Ibn Taymiyya, this led them to make various errors and contradictions in their philosophical arguments. For example, he argued that the Greek logicians' concept of the "unmoved mover" - the idea that there must be an ultimate cause or first principle behind all things - was flawed because it relied on a logical argument rather than on divine revelation.
In addition, Ibn Taymiyya also criticized the Greek logicians for their emphasis on abstract concepts and their tendency to ignore the concrete, empirical world. He argued that their focus on abstract ideas and their reliance on logic and reason led them to neglect the importance of practical knowledge and the reality of everyday life.
Ibn Taymiyya also believed that the Greek logicians' philosophical systems were incompatible with the teachings of Islam. He argued that the Qur'an and the Hadith, which are the primary sources of Islamic teachings, contain a complete and comprehensive understanding of the nature of reality. Therefore, he believed that any philosophical system that went against the teachings of Islam was fundamentally flawed.
Overall, Ibn Taymiyya's criticisms of the Greek logicians reflect his belief that the pursuit of philosophical knowledge should be grounded in divine revelation and practical knowledge, rather than on abstract concepts and logical arguments. He argued that the Greek logicians' reliance on reason and logic led them to make various errors and contradictions in their philosophical arguments, and that their philosophical systems were incompatible with the teachings of Islam.
Staff View: Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians / :: Library Catalog Search
His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. This particular edition is in a Hardcover format. During his stay in Egypt, in 1309, he was imprisoned for a few months in Alexandria. Philosophical discourse became a constant element in even traditionalist Islamic sciences. He therefore set out to refute philosophical logic, a task which culminated in one of the most devastating attacks ever levelled against the logical system upheld by the early Greeks, the later commentators, and their Muslim followers.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians : Wael B. Hallaq : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Advanced Searching Our Want to get more out of the basic search box? It was published by Clarendon Press and has a total of 368 pages in the book. EZBorrow is the easiest and fastest way to get the book you want ebooks unavailable. Unlike Ghazali, who rejected philosophical metaphysics but embraced logic, Ibn Taymiyya considered the two inextricably connected. In the Latin tradition, the most famous rejections of logic were produced by Humanist thinkers like Lorenzo Valla 1406-1457 and Joan Luis Vives 1492—1540. ففي محنته الأولى بمصر، صنف عدة كتب وهو بالسجن، استدل فيها بما احتاج إليه من الأحاديث والآثار، وذكر فيها أقوال المحدثين والفقهاء، وعزاها إلى قائليها بأسمائهم، كل ذلك بديهة اعتمادًا على حفظه، فلما روجعت لم يعثر فيها على خطأ ولا خلل. The actual argument runs something like this: in order to apprehend what is being defined through the theory of definitions, we must first apprehend the signification of the words used in the definition, but that presupposes an apprehension of the meaning and the things the words derive from. Philosophical discourse became a constant element in even traditionalist Islamic sciences.
Next
webapi.bu.edu: Customer reviews: Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians
Hallaq's work should be viewed as an important contribution to Ibn Taymiyah studies, one that largely appreciates and critically evaluates the thought of this important intellectual of the Mamluk period. His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. The introduction of Greek philosophy into the Muslim world left an indelible mark on Islamic intellectual history. He had an extensive knowledge of Quran, Sunnah, Greek philosophy, Islamic history, and religious books of others. Book Description Ibn Taymiyya, one of the greatest and most prolific thinkers of medieval Islam, held Greek logic responsible for the "heretical" metaphysical conclusions reached by Islamic philosophers, theologians, mystics, and others. The richly documented biographical and bio-bibliographical accounts of ibn Taymiyya by contemporary and later biographers and historians enable us to understand both his declared and latent To read more about the Ibn Taymiyya Against The Greek Logicians book Click the download button below to get it for free. When he was thirty, he was offered the office of Chief Justice, but refused, as he could not persuade himself to follow the limitations imposed by the authorities.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians (1993 edition)
Ibn Taymiyya is no skeptic, however, since he argues that we can attain knowledge, and that all knowledge starts with the observation of particular things. He therefore set out to refute philosophical logic, a task which culminated in one of the most devastating attacks ever levelled against the logical system upheld by the early Greeks, the later commentators, and their Muslim followers. His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. The 10 digit ISBN is 0198240430 and the 13 digit ISBN is 9780198240433. Even though he rejects the theory, he still maintains that a syllogism formed with two premises and a conclusion is valid. Philosophical discourse became a constant element in even traditionalist Islamic sciences.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by Wael B. Hallaq, Hardcover
Qadi remembered with pride that it was he who had first permitted an intelligent and learned man like Ibn Taimiyah to give Fatwa. He writes: The unknown particulars in the external world will be known by drawing an analogy to the particulars that are known. The text also presupposes quite a bit of knowledge of the theories that are being rejected. At the same age, he started delivering lectures. It is obviously not written for laypeople. Unlike Ghazali, who rejected philosophical metaphysics but embraced logic, Ibn Taymiyya considered the two inextricably connected.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya's Refutation of the Syllogisms
Logicians: 256 The universal premise assumed in a demonstrative syllogism can never be true without a complete induction and that is impossible. Ibn Taymiyya instead argues that even though it is a perfectly valid argument, it is useless, since it does not lead to any new knowledge. Professor Hallaq's translation, with a substantial introduction and extensive notes, makes this important work available to a wider audience for the first time. If there is no self-evident knowledge, that is, if there is no knowledge that does not require justification, then all knowledge needs justification and this implies an infinite regress of justification, as we saw in Chapter 1. In a similar way, we can come to know universally, although he thinks full universality is impossible and unknowable, since we can never experience all the particulars, that is, he points to what we now call the problem of induction.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by ابن تيمية
Logicians: 12 This kind of argument is quite common in the text. However, Aristotelian metaphysics gave rise to doctrines about God and the universe that were found highly objectionable by a number of Muslim theologians, among whom the fourteenth-century scholar Ibn Taymiyya stood foremost. Hence, even though we have knowledge of particulars there is a limit to our knowledge and we can never fully know something universally, which will be a serious problem for syllogistics and, particularly, for Aristotelian demonstrations, which are the syllogisms that produce scientific knowledge. His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. This is a problem Taymiyya is fully aware of and which he exploits in his rejection of the theory of the syllogisms. If your book is not available on EZBorrow, you can request it through ILLiad ebooks unavailable. The universals we think we have in our minds are without support in reality and, hence, fictions of our minds.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians (October 19, 1993 edition)
Hallaq's translation, with a substantial introduction and extensive notes, makes available to a wider audience for the first time an important work that will be of interest to specialists in ancient and medieval philosophy and to historians of logic and empiricist philosophy, as well as to scholars of Islam and Middle Eastern thought. During that time, he was allowed visitors and held many philosophical discussions. However, Aristotelian metaphysics gave rise to doctrines about God and the universe that were found highly objectionable by a number of Muslim theologians, among whom the fourteenth-century scholar Ibn Taymiyya stood foremost. You can also use ILLiad to request chapter scans and articles. He seems not to have been a hugely influential scholar during his lifetime, but in recent years his religious thinking has seen a great revival and he is perhaps the most influential Medieval Islamic scholar today. Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
Next
Ibn Taymiyyah Against the Greek Logicians
Ibn Taymeeyah was barely seventeen, when Qadi Al-Maqdisi authorized him to issue Fatwa legal verdict. Use ILLiad for articles and chapter scans. The introduction of Greek philosophy into the Muslim world left an indelible mark on Islamic intellectual history. This books publish date is Nov 11, 1993. Logicians: 261 He here clearly presents himself as an empiricist and a nominalist, that is, he holds that all knowledge ultimately derives from sense perception and that all there is in the world are particular things. The idea expressed here is that we know new particulars by analogy, that is, by associating the known ones with the not-known ones.
Next
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians pdf
Professor Hallaq's translation, with a substantial introduction and extensive notes, makes available to a wider audience for the first time an important work that will be of interest to specialists in ancient and medieval philosophy and to historians of logic and empiricist philosophy, as well as to scholars of Islam and Middle Eastern thought. Book Summary: The title of this book is Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians. . It is obvious therefore that they themselves can learn nothing new from such forms of reasoning, and hence that ordinary dialectic is of no use whatever to those who wish to investigate the truth of things. Taymiyya directs his critique, foremost, at the theory of definitions and syllogisms.
Next