Doom film review. Doom movie review & film summary (2005) 2022-11-02
Doom film review Rating:
4,7/10
1281
reviews
Doom is a first-person shooter video game that was released in 1993 and was developed by id Software. The game was a revolutionary addition to the gaming industry and is considered a classic by many fans. It has also been adapted into a film that was released in 2005, and this review will be focusing on the film adaptation.
The plot of the film follows a group of marines who are sent to a research facility on Mars after strange and deadly events start occurring there. The marines are tasked with finding out what is causing the strange events and stopping it before it spreads to Earth. As they delve deeper into the facility, they discover that the cause of the strange occurrences is a group of genetically enhanced humans who have been mutated by an ancient Martian virus.
One of the biggest problems with the film is that it strays significantly from the plot of the original game. While the game is set on Mars and involves genetically enhanced humans, the story of the film has very little in common with the game beyond these basic details. This can be quite disappointing for fans of the game who were expecting a more faithful adaptation.
Another issue with the film is its lack of character development. The characters in the film are all one-dimensional and lack any real depth or complexity. This makes it difficult to become invested in their storylines or to care about their fates.
The acting in the film is also quite wooden, with many of the actors delivering their lines in a robotic and uninspired manner. This, combined with the shallow characters, makes it difficult to connect with the film on an emotional level.
The special effects in the film are also quite underwhelming. While the design of the mutated humans is somewhat interesting, the overall effects are quite poorly done and look dated by today's standards.
Overall, Doom is a disappointing adaptation of the classic video game. It lacks a compelling story, well-developed characters, and good acting, and its special effects are underwhelming. While it may be worth a watch for fans of the game who are curious about the film, it is unlikely to appeal to a wider audience.
Film Review: Doom (2005)
I know some of you have an attachment to Doom, perhaps even an unhealthy one, and the thought of changing something about it makes you want to complain about it on the internet a whole bunch, and I'm sure you will. Which isn't a very innovative or interesting idea, particularly when their medium of choice is a trashy Hollywood movie. Likely a biologist but the movie mentions that she worked directly on uncovering the dig site so there may be multiple Phds in her past. He's where the action is. Doom has generally received mixed reviews.
The fact that the franchise returned from the dead in 2016 was something of a miracle. The year is 2046. And, though the sister resents her brother's choice to become a soldier, how does the film suggest her dedication to science might also be misplaced? In the middle of an American desert has been discovered a portal to an ancient city on Mars. Samantha Grim, played by British actress Rosamund Pike whose job it to retrieve scientific data and research. So perhaps the unhealthy obsession with Doom does come into play, because I still enjoyed the movie even though I probably shouldn't have. When are they ever good? Doom: Annihilation loosely follows the plot of the first video game. The mutant is evidently able to teleport as it snatches all the doctors that follow Carmack from different angles.
If Doom: Annihilation had been a Syfy original movie with no relationship to the Doom video game series, then it would only be a competently made film that never left much of an impression. The multiplayer is, in my opinion, nothing outstanding compared to the single-player campaign. Doom Patrol -- part support group, part superhero team -- is a band of superpowered freaks fighting for a world that wants nothing to do with them. Show more My god, is this movie so amazingly bad. . Doom is an arena-type shooter: you wander around a location, enter a room, all the exits seal up, and hordes of demons teleport right under your nose. This passion would ideally extend to the actors.
And while it also had to deal with the misplaced plot point of a serum derived from the chromosomes of dead Martians not making that up , there were certain elements that worked. The unit is assigned to retrieve data and keep the mutants from moving through the same passageway called the "Arc" through which he and the guys have arrived on Mars. There are a number of fights, many of which are so over the top that you just can't help cringing in entertainment as some poor marine gets thrown around like a rag doll. When an archeological research facility on Mars comes under assault by monstrous mutants, he and his men are assigned to recover survivors and data, but most important, to contain the threat. So, I give the movie the benefit of the doubt and I review it not as a connoisseur of cinema which I'm not anyway , but as a gamer who likes games where he can shoot things and watch them writhe in simulated agony. When you walk into one of the arenas, things get much hotter. It has a surprisingly beautiful ending with a kind message.
A team of scientists discovers ancient technology on one of the moons of Mars and they manage to create a teleporter that can act as a gateway to Earth. It is there, and it is detailed enough to explain what is going on, why, and who the hell you are—but missing out on it will not spoil the fun. Meanwhile, their pastime is chasing humans, grabbing them, smashing them, eviscerating and disemboweling them, pulling them through grates, and in general doing anything that can take place obscurely in shadows and not require a lot of special effects. Of course then id went and released Doom 3 to somewhat lackluster fanfare. If this means everyone dies along with the mutants, so be it. They are brutal, quick and get even quicker after an upgrade , and do not interrupt the flow of the fight.
I know some of you have an attachment to Doom, perhaps even an unhealthy one, and the thought of changing something about it makes you want to complain about it on the internet a whole bunch, and I'm sure you will. I know I said I'd review it as a gamer, but I figured that I'd get all the movie stuff out of the way. SYNOPSIS: Space Marines are sent to investigate strange events at a research facility on Mars but find themselves at the mercy of genetically enhanced killing machines. At least for me the problem isn't that they're "messing up" the plot, it's that they're making a plot out of nothing, and instead of doing so comically they feel like everything has to be explained. Like the Godzilla movies dubbed.
But those two are the fundamentals. Oh yeah, off topic. Arenas are carefully designed to provide enough space for horizontal and vertical movement double-jumps! Doom is a decent game I personally hate it, but whatever , but it should not be a movie! Doom 3 was a disappointment for me, and I did not expect much from the fourth part okay, relaunch either. Doom is a decent game I personally hate it, but whatever , but it should not be a movie! Our special effects team is being held at GUN POINT, our make-up team's families have been KIDNAPPED, our director is a raging SCHITZO PSYCHOPATH and our actors have been told to SHUT THE FUCK UP. We all know the Grand Theft Auto franchise.
Or the double-barrel shotgun, which in 2016 is still the same terror for the demons as it used to be back in the 1990s. But while the iconic Imps are there and Dark is wielding a BFG, nothing really comes of it. However it does take place on Mars, if that's any consolation. So yeah, I didn't hate this movie and I'm sure I'll be in the minority when it comes out on Friday. Is Sarge right to follow orders no matter what? While they get to the yoga retreat quite quickly in the film, the story still has a slow start and pace. I feel what every one thinks its lacking are 2 things, first its lacking an "interpretational" story line, secondly it seems to be lacking the power behind the acting to make the acting seem beliveable not allways the actors fault BUT hey, like usual, what do I know? The Rock is entertaining, showing off his hard body and investing workmanlike dialogue with some humor.
/pic3116318.jpg)
