Cons of drug testing in high school. The Cons of Required Drug Testing 2022-10-21
Cons of drug testing in high school Rating:
4,7/10
1326
reviews
Drug testing in high schools has become a controversial topic in recent years, with some arguing that it is a necessary measure to ensure the safety and well-being of students, while others argue that it is a violation of privacy and civil liberties. In this essay, we will explore some of the cons of drug testing in high schools, highlighting the potential negative consequences and drawbacks of this policy.
One of the main arguments against drug testing in high schools is that it violates students' privacy and civil liberties. Many people believe that drug testing amounts to an invasion of privacy, as it requires students to provide a sample of their bodily fluids or hair for analysis. This can be embarrassing and uncomfortable for students, and some may feel that it is a violation of their personal rights. Additionally, some argue that drug testing may be prone to false positives, leading to innocent students being wrongly accused and punished.
Another con of drug testing in high schools is that it can create a climate of distrust and suspicion among students. When students are required to undergo drug testing, it can create a sense of mistrust between them and school officials, as they may feel that they are being unfairly targeted or treated with suspicion. This can lead to a breakdown in the relationship between students and school officials, which can have negative impacts on the school community as a whole.
Furthermore, drug testing in high schools may not be effective in achieving its intended goals. Some studies have shown that drug testing does not significantly reduce drug use among students, and may even have the opposite effect by driving drug use underground and making it more difficult to detect. This can lead to increased risk-taking behavior and potentially more dangerous consequences for students.
Another potential downside of drug testing in high schools is the cost. Implementing a drug testing program can be expensive, requiring the purchase of testing kits, hiring additional staff to administer the tests, and paying for laboratory analysis. This cost may be difficult for some schools to bear, particularly those with limited resources.
In conclusion, while drug testing in high schools may be well-intentioned, it can also have several negative consequences and drawbacks. It can violate students' privacy and civil liberties, create a climate of distrust, and may not be effective in reducing drug use. Additionally, the cost of implementing a drug testing program can be a significant burden for some schools. While it is important to address drug use in schools, it is also important to consider the potential consequences and drawbacks of drug testing policies before implementing them.
Why there should be drug testing in schools?
Conclusion Generally, mandatory drug testing has its own pros and cons which should be considered first in order to come up with a decision of implementing the policy. Even though the ability to intervene early and help the student to stop using is a plus, legal issues such as privacy and human rights also come into play when it comes to drug testing in schools. Proponents of drug testing in schools are generally operating on the disease model view that only complete abstinence can truly help someone. Ultimately, it comes down to how we answer the important questions that will enable the pro and cons to drug testing in schools. There are few cons to drug testing in high school sports, as long as such programs are executed in right spirit. The people who agree with the mandatory drug testing, mostly the educators, say that drug testing is an efficient way of keeping the students away from the use of illegal drugs. Their school did not have drug testing and they had no idea what their son had been doing.
Drug Testing In A High School Setting: Pros And Cons Argumentative Essay Example
Mandatory drug testing can just create suspicion and does not define the grounds between the casual users and abusers. The lack of actual evidence means that the teacher's opinion may outweigh what the student has to say. This is one of the disparities seen on drug testing and sometimes particular issues like racism and the like can be associated to it Shamoo and Tauer, 2002. How can we prevent and respond to drug abuse? However, enough reason is needed before the conducting drug tests for a specific student just like for example having suspicious actions, having red eyes and the like. While general drug testing can been seen as unreasonable, specific drug testing has to be allowed — especially, when it is limited to extracurricular athletics. Another recent study, conducted by the University of Pennsylvania, found that policies didn't stop male students, and drug testing only worked as a deterrent for female students in schools with positive student-teacher relationships and clear rules. It is understandable that use of drug testing is being considered as a prevention tool with student-athletes since both NCAA and many professional sports employ this methodology.
They often address specific substances with the aim of reducing use and raising awareness about the associated problems. Acton case, the Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of a drug testing program applied to student-athletes at the high school level. Thus, it is regarded as an immoral act if drug testing will be insisted Pohlman et al. To be effective, examining why a school might feel a need to drug test students must be viewed from through one or more of the three perspectives discussed. Drugs in sports are becoming an issue everywhere.
It would allow any discrepancies in the drug testing, allowing for the potential of false negatives, and the idea that if a child, say a child that has been exposed to methamphetamine use or marijuana use by guardians or parents, to had an advocate appointed for the immediate removal of the child from the residence of the offender. During the test, the student would enter a locker room with an adult monitor who would check the sample produced for temperature and tampering. Beginning in the 1980's, these individuals sued the institutions who developed the drug testing policies so that they could avoid being tested as a requirement of participation. If Student Athletes Should Take Drug Testing Persuasive Essay students be required to take drug test? Along with the cost, if drugs are a problem in general at school, then schools should not solely call out athletes for drug testing, but the rest of the school as well. Anti-Doping Association USADA , most athletes start using ergogenic aids in high school. Curbing drug use and implementing drug testing policies are significant concerns of parents, administrators and us coaches. There could be further complications still if it is being used as a prescribed substance as a treatment of some type of disability, yet it is used as a disqualifier for employment.
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Drug Testing In Schools
Journal of School Health 73:159—67. According to a 2008 study from the National Drug Abuse Institute, about 14 percent of schools had drug testing policies. The reason to administer drug tests is to determine whether or not an athlete is under the influence of any PEDs. Further, it may be easier to cut ties with a candidate who fails a drug screen than an employee who is already trained and integrated into the company. Sometimes drug tests are not accurate which can destroy the record of a student. You must be placed on the agenda ahead of time.
By punishing teen users, the potential for academic harm increases, perpetuating an already precarious cycle of drug abuse and low self-esteem. Mandatory drug testing for high school athletes should be required because it decreases drug use in schools, is relatively inexpensive, and can prevent drug use and or abuse that can lead to a lifelong addiction. The efficacy of this tool in curbing drug use has yet to be thoroughly evaluated, however. Ethically questionable research with children—The fenuramine study. The district implemented a drug testing policy that applied to all students participating in athletics, requiring each student to sign a form consenting to the random urinalysis testing policy before being allowed to participate in sports. If you are against this savage act then you have the right opinion.
Just Say No to Random Drug Testing: A Guide for Students
Heroin, morphine and oxycodone are all narcotics derived from poppies, so consuming poppy seeds prior to a drug test may bring up a positive result for drugs the student did not take. Risks and Rewards When considering any employment screening program, a company should be looking at the four dominant factors that a screening program effects, said Dr. There is nothing that can be harmful with peeing in a cup. Sometimes, unreasonable outcomes should be anticipated as this issue is treated as a sensitive case. Each student from kindergarten to twelfth grade would need to be drug tested at the time they are admitted into school at the beginning of their school year. Another advantage is being confident on other drug tests. The school board required students to have annual exams that included a urinalysis.
Administrators use the fear of random testing to deter students, while relying on the actual test to identify teens who already have a problem. Student athletes should be drug tested because it causes health risks, it is illegal and cheating, and finally it teaches negative lessons. At this moment, it is unsure what will happen to the students that test positive. Institutions of higher education must work diligently to creatively and proactively address the ongoing challenge of drug abuse. The school did not require observed specimen collection, a positive test did not result in expulsion, and privacy concerns of students that were required to disclose any medication they were taking were adequately addressed by the school. In the harm reduction model, the idea of testing becomes a problem in that this perspective usually focuses on the civil liberties of someone who may be addicted.
Pre-employment drug testing is the most common type, according to Quest Diagnostics, which provides drug-screening services. Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry IRMS is a relatively new technique that is being proposed for verification of testosterone positives. Withdrawals from anabolic steroids can result in depression and in some cases, suicide. Not only do drug tests violate the Fourth Amendment, but they are also not always 100% accurate. Keep copies of articles, letters, and the actual policy, and have them on hand. The inconsistency between federal and state laws is a negative aspect of drug testing. What is the role of parents in preventing drug use among children? The addictive properties of drugs were believed to be within the drugs rather than in the circumstances of the person using the drugs.
Do you know someone who is a student athlete? Students refusing to submit to testing are to be expelled from school. In… Drug Testing Athletes Essay enhancing drugs used by athletes to help them build muscle and perform outstandingly. Psychologist Bruce Alexander's research led to a new approach known as the community connection model, which views addiction as a common response to isolation and lack of community. Reasonable suspicion may include concrete facts or much more subjective criteria. Harm Reduction Model In contrast, the harm reduction model attempts to wean the addicted person off the illegal drugs by replacing street drugs with safer legal medicine as an alternative. There are various types of drugs that are available to high school and college students.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/is-water-fasting-safe-4588873-a-0ba65e3ecbcb40f8baef15ab5517271f.jpg)
