The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the practice of executing individuals as punishment for certain crimes. It has been used throughout history and is still used in some countries today, although it is increasingly being abolished as more and more people argue against its use. There are many arguments against the death penalty, and in this essay, we will explore some of the most compelling ones.
One argument against the death penalty is that it is inherently cruel and inhumane. The idea of putting someone to death as punishment for a crime is deeply disturbing, and the execution process itself can be incredibly gruesome and painful. In some cases, executions have gone wrong and the person being put to death has suffered greatly as a result. This is not a just or appropriate way to treat any human being, regardless of the crime they have committed.
Another argument against the death penalty is that it is not an effective deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the death penalty does not significantly reduce the rates of violent crime, and in some cases, it may even increase crime rates. This is because the death penalty does not address the root causes of crime, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education and opportunities. Instead, it simply punishes the individual who committed the crime and does nothing to prevent others from committing similar crimes in the future.
A third argument against the death penalty is that it is prone to error and can result in the execution of innocent people. The criminal justice system is not perfect and mistakes can be made, particularly when it comes to cases that carry the death penalty. There have been numerous cases in which people have been sentenced to death and later found to be innocent, often due to new evidence that was not available at the time of their trial. The risk of executing an innocent person is simply too high and cannot be justified.
Finally, the death penalty is a costly and inefficient way to punish criminals. The process of seeking and carrying out the death penalty is much more expensive than simply imprisoning someone for life. This is because it requires extensive legal proceedings, appeals, and the cost of housing and caring for death row inmates. In addition, the death penalty takes much longer to carry out than a life sentence, which means that the taxpayer is paying for the costs of the death penalty for many years before the execution takes place.
In conclusion, there are many strong arguments against the death penalty. It is cruel, inhumane, and does not effectively deter crime. It is also prone to error and can result in the execution of innocent people. Additionally, it is a costly and inefficient way to punish criminals. For these reasons, it is clear that the death penalty should be abolished and alternative methods of punishment should be sought.
Argument Against The Death Penalty
Today, capital punishment most likely has other goals, such as revenge. One must wonder why they made this decision. If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. In order to abolish the death penalty in the United States successfully, one would need to make a case to the United States Supreme Court. Persuasive Essay On Death Penalty 750 Words 3 Pages Death Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. Similar to the case of Max Soffar who may have been innocent, but died of cancer before he had the chance to fight for the freedom he may have deserved Houston Press. Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's Argument For Capital Punishment This essay will be discussing whether the death penalty is wrong.
Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty Debate The death penalty has been around for a long time, but most people don't think about it at all. If housing just one is millions of dollars, than imagine how much money it is when housing multiple. First, it violates religious views and beliefs, innocent people get wrongly accused and mostly executed, costs way too much money, and lastly it is not how we deal with crimes. If the death penalty does not bring closure, does not deter crime, and fails over three percent of the time, how can it be right; what gives us, humans, the power to kill other humans? If new advances in technology regarding the criminal justice system were to be discovered and the death penalty was not implemented, an individual would gain their rights and freedom back. From the philosophical point of view, as mentioned by Immanuel Kant, the murderer should atone by giving up their own life Flanders, 2013. Ineffectiveness to Deter Crime The death penalty is arguably an effective technique to deter crime.
Arguments Against The Death Penalty Essay
There can be long delays in the execution process. Works Cited Death Penalty: An International Perspective 2010 The Death Penalty: An International Perspective. New York: Columbia UP, Academic Search Complete, 2000. Also, because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will discredit the ideas that the death penalty is not constitutional, irreversible mistakes are made, and that race and income will face disproportionality. The life imprisonment could save lives of many innocent people who would have been executed by the death penalty. In the same way, some people strongly believe that a person who has taken the life of another person does not have a right to live. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not.
