Aesthetic judgement. 8.2 Aesthetic Experience and Judgement 2022-10-21

Aesthetic judgement Rating: 7,3/10 632 reviews

Aesthetic judgement refers to the evaluation and appreciation of the beauty or appeal of a work of art or other aesthetic object. It is a subjective and personal process, as each individual has their own unique preferences and tastes when it comes to art and beauty.

One way to think about aesthetic judgement is through the concept of the "aesthetic experience," which refers to the emotional and cognitive response that an individual has to an aesthetic object. This experience can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the individual's cultural background, personal experiences, and individual preferences. For example, someone who grew up surrounded by traditional Western art may have a different aesthetic experience when viewing a piece of traditional African art than someone who grew up surrounded by African art.

The process of making aesthetic judgements involves both cognitive and emotional components. On the cognitive side, an individual may consider the technical aspects of a work of art, such as its composition, use of color, or technique. They may also consider the context in which the work was created, including the artist's intentions and the cultural or historical context in which it was produced.

On the emotional side, an individual's aesthetic experience may be influenced by their own feelings and emotional responses to the work. This can include feelings of awe, wonder, joy, or even sadness, depending on the work and the individual's personal experiences.

Aesthetic judgement is not just limited to works of art. It can also apply to other aesthetic objects, such as architecture, fashion, or even natural landscapes. In each case, an individual's aesthetic experience is influenced by their own personal preferences and experiences.

There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to aesthetic judgement, as beauty is a highly subjective concept. What one person finds appealing may not be the same for another. This is why it is important to consider and respect the personal aesthetic experiences and preferences of others, even if they differ from our own.

In conclusion, aesthetic judgement is the process of evaluating and appreciating the beauty or appeal of an aesthetic object. It involves both cognitive and emotional components and is highly subjective, as each individual has their own unique preferences and tastes. It is important to consider and respect the personal aesthetic experiences and preferences of others, even if they differ from our own.

Aesthetic Judgment (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

aesthetic judgement

Or perhaps, even more cautiously: some judgments are better than others. This presupposes knowledge of the very results of the third Critique. However, the conception of truth applicable in aesthetics might be one according to which truth only implies the sort of normativity described above, according to which there are correct and incorrect judgments of taste, or at least that some judgments are better than others. If, on the contrary, beauty or at least a concept of beauty is a generic over-arching aesthetic value, then one suggestion would be that sublimity should be understood as a kind of beauty. The hard question is whether, and if so how, such a subjectively universal judgment is possible. However, it is not clear whether Kant would go along with this, for he characterizes normativity in a way that ties in with his eventual explanation of its possibility. With a disinterested attitude, personal biases and irrelevant emotions are set aside.

Next

Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgment

aesthetic judgement

Secondly, one thing that drives people to this implausible relativism, which is so out of line with their own practice, is a perceived connection of relativism with tolerance or anti-authoritarianism. In a sense, some things just do taste better than others, and some judgments of excellence in food are better than others. Form includes the way that the parts and materials are put together and organized. We might want others to share our judgment for all sorts of strange reasons. But a deeper discussion of this would be desirable.

Next

Aesthetic Judgment

aesthetic judgement

It is no accident that Kant phrases the obligation in interpersonal terms, considering where he is going. This is the Big Question in aesthetics. And if we say that they ought to judge a certain way, we need to say more. Beyond this, there will be theoretical divergence. These are live issues. For some purposes, it is useful to do this.

Next

8.2 Aesthetic Experience and Judgement

aesthetic judgement

But in psychological experiments there is a requirement on the opacity of the point of an experiment to the experimental subjects. By carefully, skillfully, and convincingly exhibiting the different interests and aspects that Kant had in mind in different particular passages, Allison explains how such passages that seem to contradict one another, in fact do not. These are, respectively: cross-object supervenience, cross-time supervenience, and cross-world supervenience. A powerful defence of the claim that mathematical and logical proofs have aesthetic properties. The issue is controversial.

Next

Aesthetic Judgment > Notes (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

aesthetic judgement

But it might be replied that particular instances of stark grimness may be value-neutral? Critique of the Power of Judgment. That is, if taste is bound up with the immediacy of our feelings, and is not derived from principles or properties, then all sentiment would be right, and there would be no way to have discussion or disagreement about taste. For Kant, an interesse means a kind of pleasure that is not connected with desire; it is neither grounded in desire, nor does it produce it. Some people are comfortable with art that portrays something they recognize; it can elevate an aesthetic experience more effectively than art that is completely abstract. Makes claims about the sublime in Beethoven. Or we can equally well say that the truth of aesthetic judgments is independent of our aesthetic judgments but it is dependent on nonaesthetic truths. This would be as much as to say that there is no taste at all, i.

Next

Reasoned and Unreasoned Judgement: On Inference, Acquaintance and Aesthetic Normativity

aesthetic judgement

The judgment must thus be entirely disinterested and free of any thought that relates the object to anything else. On this matter, Kant's opinion is clear. . Such satisfaction always has reference to the faculty of desire, either as its determining ground or as necessarily connected with its determining ground. Perhaps some more complicated, sophisticated mind-dependence thesis holds; but a simple mind-dependence claim flouts common sense. Despite this, Sibley was surely minimally right to think that ascribing aesthetic properties to a thing requires more than merely knowing its nonaesthetic properties. Reprinted Harmonsworth: Penguin, 1998.

Next

Kant's Theory of Taste, A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment

aesthetic judgement

If so, there is a sense in which aesthetic properties are mind-dependent, since appearances are appearances to some observer. Granting the anomalousness of aesthetic properties, then, we need to explain it. The two kinds of judgments answer to quite different sets of constraints. The normativity of judgment derives from the normativity of feeling. In some cases, the correctness of a judgment of taste may be impossibly difficult to decide. Disinterestedjudgements are impartial and pure; interestedones are biased and tainted with our personal experience and emotions. For example, some beginners in introduction to moral philosophy classes claim that all moral views are equally correct, and that it is very bad to think otherwise.

Next

Aesthetic webapi.bu.edu

aesthetic judgement

They ought to share it on pain of making a judgment which is incorrect or inappropriate. Perhaps there are rarefied beauties that only elite special souls can appreciate. But this is what we do say of some aesthetic judgments. We may say that it is a mistake to use much salt or sugar but that is only because it swamps the flavors that would be enjoyed by most people. A superb discussion of architecture, but also contains much material relevant to more central topics in aesthetics. Aesthetic ideas are crucial for the Dialectic and for beauty as a symbol of the morally good. He also describes how designers intentionally instill their creations with features intended to arouse feelings, what he calls a limbic response.

Next